Impakter
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Impakter logo
No Result
View All Result
Ukraine’s Spectacular Counter-Offensive: How Solid?

Ukraine’s Spectacular Counter-Offensive: How Solid?

Ukrainian troops retake some 6000 square kilometers but it may be too soon to “dance victory”; meanwhile Armenia and Azerbaijan that had clashed in Russia's "backyard" - another problem for Putin - have agreed to a ceasefire

Claude Forthomme - Senior EditorbyClaude Forthomme - Senior Editor
September 15, 2022
in Politics & Foreign Affairs, Society
0

Updated Sept. 15. Since the start of this month, the Ukraine army has launched a counter-offensive, making spectacular advances in the east and south, a fact regularly reported by Ukrainian authorities and President Zelensky in his daily televised messages. At first, he wasn’t fully believed but skepticism disappeared after Ukrainian troops retook Izium, a key Russian logistics hub, on Saturday. Then Ukrainian troops continued their efforts, gaining some 6000 square kilometers by September 13. 

Here is how it looks on the map:

Source: France 24 September 13 news

Kyiv had warned US generals in advance of their two-pronged counter-offensive but nobody expected “Ukraine’s blitzkrieg” to move so quickly. 

It appears that precision rocket launchers and artillery shells provided by the U.S. were key to successfully battering Russian forces, helped in targeting enemy positions by U.S.-made counter-battery radars and satellite imagery provided by US intelligence. They can hit targets up to 80 kilometers (50 miles) away. Also of help were heavily armored vehicles donated by the U.S., U.K., and Australia. 

These are the indicative estimates of Russia’s combat losses as of Sept. 13, according to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/jrAZN8L2ao

— The Kyiv Independent (@KyivIndependent) September 13, 2022

Ukrainian leaders are still asking more — including fighter jets and the longer-range Army Tactical Missile System, or ATACMS, a surface-to-surface missile that the U.S. has so far declined to send.

A key question going forward will be how much more Congress and the American public are willing to spend on the war in Ukraine. It’s unclear if, or how, Ukraine fighters’ successes in recent days will affect the ongoing debate. The White House has asked Congress to greenlight an additional $11.7 billion in aid to Ukraine as part of an overall government funding measure that must be approved before the end of the month.

There is no question that military support from EU member countries has been too timid, and often more symbolic than real.

Moreover, a controversy has arisen around Germany’s refusal to send tanks to Ukraine or allow countries that have purchased German-made Leopard tanks to transfer them to Kyiv. Yesterday, German Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht, in defense of this position, said “no country has delivered Western-built infantry fighting vehicles or main battle tanks so far,” and Berlin “will not take such action unilaterally.” 

Meanwhile, in this phase of the war, American military support continues unwaveringly: The Biden administration announced a $675 million drawdown of munitions and armored vehicles last week, and a congressional aide familiar with the issue said there will likely be another package announced as soon as this week for roughly $600 million more of similar equipment pulled by U.S. stockpiles.

Russian damage to life and property is enormous 

In addition to Izium, more than “20 settlements”, i.e. villages and small towns, were retaken. But the damage to both life and property was found to be appallingly extensive everywhere. 

For example, regarding Izium, a town of 40,000, an estimated 80 percent of the buildings were destroyed by the Russians at the start of the war and at least 1000 killed, according to Ukrainian authorities:

Liberated Izyum. 80% of buildings ruined. At least 1000 persons killed #StopRussia #StandWithUkraine pic.twitter.com/r2pMzKnSwG

— Mariana Betsa (@Mariana_Betsa) September 12, 2022

Stories are now coming out, telling of torture and people disappearing as Russians exercised a reign of terror over the conquered population. The human suffering is enormous and the legacy of war resulting from the death of loved ones, an unrecognizable landscape of razed homes and fields with buried land mines is staggering.

The counter-offensive is warmly welcomed by the local population

Wherever the Ukrainian troops arrive, the local population greets them joyfully as rescuers. For months they have suffered, and it is a relief for them to be back in Ukraine’s fold, as this video well documents:

This joy in welcoming Ukrainian soldiers is worth underlining as it confirms that Ukrainians are in fact fighting to regain their own country from the aggressor. It puts paid to Putin’s claims that this is nothing more than a “special military operation” to “denazify” Ukraine.

Is the counter-offensive a game-changer? 

Many military experts think so, and yesterday the UK Guardian published an editorial describing it as a “stunning breakthrough”. Michael Kofman of the CNA think tank told Politico: 

“The current period is best described as a window of opportunity for Ukraine, seizing the initiative to not just take territory, but also deal blows to the Russian military from which they will struggle to recover during the winter.” 

The UK Defense Ministry issued this statement, viewing Russian forces as “severely weakened”:

Latest Defence Intelligence update on the situation in Ukraine – 13 September 2022

Find out more about the UK government’s response: https://t.co/BYZhjLmtmf

🇺🇦 #StandWithUkraine 🇺🇦 pic.twitter.com/r0Cf3z3wab

— Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧 (@DefenceHQ) September 13, 2022

For some, the rout could be a decisive moment in the war. There is little doubt that Ukraine’s recapture of most of Kharkiv Province has significantly weakened Russia’s hold on eastern Ukraine, a region that Russia has used as a stronghold to wage its war since February.

Russia’s Ministry of Defense confirmed that it had pulled its forces out of Izium. However, and as to be expected, this was not an admission of defeat: They claimed the retreat was pre-planned, a move to regroup and strengthen forces in the East for further, future attacks. 

So it should come as no surprise, as AP reported, that the White House and the Pentagon are cautious and “avoid victory dance in Ukraine combat advances”.

So far it is too soon to tell whether it is in fact a new phase in the war. Some even worry that Ukrainian forces may run the risk of becoming vulnerable as they are stretched too thinly.

Yet the advances are quite real and confirmed by satellite imagery:

NEW: #Ukrainian forces are continuing to make impactful gains in #Kherson Oblast and are steadily degrading the morale and combat capabilities of #Russian forces in this area.

The latest with @criticalthreats:https://t.co/gjDA0Mp2kt pic.twitter.com/xk3L3VkVfL

— ISW (@TheStudyofWar) September 13, 2022

While Russian extremists on social media are pushing Putin to scale up the war effort, with right-wing bloggers slamming the Kremlin war effort, there are on the Ukraine side of social media, some dreamers imagining a daring strategy to retake Ukrainian territory from Russia:

For example, here’s a tweet describing a “leaked plan of Kherson offensive” that would retake Crimea with a backside circular movement, like a boomerang:

Leaked plan of Kherson offensive pic.twitter.com/u3kIJZ1YQh

— Special Kherson Cat 🐈🇺🇦 (@bayraktar_1love) September 9, 2022

Day-dreaming? Maybe, maybe not, who knows. Although, as the Guardian wrote in its op-ed, “Ultimately, driving Russian forces back to at least within the territories taken over in 2014 no longer seems implausible” – thus betraying a widely-held notion in the West that it’s okay for Ukraine to give up on Crimea, presumably because one shouldn’t “squeeze” Putin too much.

Many politicians in the West, starting with French President Macron, believe that peace cannot happen unless some “space” is given to Putin to “save face”. This is a position President Zelensky and most Ukrainians reject.

Meanwhile, Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-largest city is suffering from continued power outages, as a result of Russian missile attacks. Is Russia planning an energy war this winter, leaving Ukrainians without heat and light? 

Ukrainian intelligence believes that Russia is preparing to renew its attacks on the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant as part of the Kremlin’s efforts to target Ukraine’s infrastructure, specifically the country’s energy system. 

⚡️ Ukrainian intelligence: Russia preparing new shelling of Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, danger to other nuclear facilities remains high.

— The Kyiv Independent (@KyivIndependent) September 13, 2022

The latest estimates of the cost of the war: According to a recent joint report issued by the World Bank, the European Commission and Ukraine’s government and covering the period from the start of the Russian invasion on Feb. 24 through June 1, Ukraine has suffered an estimated $252 billion in “aggregate losses”, including economic disruptions and other costs of the conflict.

And Ukraine’s economy contracted sharply, with its gross domestic product showing a year-over-year decline of 15.1 percent at the end of the first quarter.

Clearly, the sooner this war stops, the better. But Ukraine’s resolve to win the war, now that it has rung up some real victories, is stronger than ever:

⚡️ Kuleba: Peace talks with Russia are only being held on the battlefield.

Ukraine doesn’t reject the idea of peace talks, but will only partake as far as they concern the complete restoration of the territorial integrity of Ukraine, said Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba.

— The Kyiv Independent (@KyivIndependent) September 13, 2022

The big question is whether Russia can muster freshly trained troops to move forward.

In July, CNN reported that the call had gone out across Russia for more than 30,000 volunteers to join the war effort in Ukraine, with offers of big cash bonuses to lure them, stating that no experience was necessary. But Kateryna Stepanenko, a Russia researcher at ISW, said those new recruits would likely be of little help on the battlefield as there would not be enough time to train them.

Theoretically, Putin could call back some 2 million men under arms who are now on reserve – but he hasn’t done so, not yet.  “At the moment no, there is no discussion of this,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said today.

Indeed, Putin might well hesitate. How well trained would these reservists be and ready for a war that has now become very sophisticated as a result of Western equipment? This is open to question. Moreover, there is a psychological element to consider: Will new Russian recruits, once they are in Ukraine, be happy with fighting a war against another Slav country?

And a new challenge has just arisen for Putin now that another war has broken in Russia’s “backyard”, a clash between Armenia and Azerbaijan – once again a result of the unresolved Nagorno-Kabarakh question.

Armenia’s Prime Minister announced on September 13 the death of 49 Armenian soldiers and said he is calling on Russia’s aid to put an end to the conflict. By September 14, the number of killed soldiers had climbed to 99, the worst death toll since the last conflict, in 2020. France said it would raise the crisis at the United Nations Security Council – thus bringing up the conflict to the attention of the whole world.

By September 15, it looked like the crisis might be coming to a close, as Armenia and Azerbaijan agreed on a ceasefire, after the Azeri troops reportedly took control of an additional 10 square kilometers of Armenian territory:

To understand why Armenia is calling on Russia, it helps to remember that Armenia has been historically leery of NATO because Turkey – a long-time enemy – is a member of the alliance; thus, Armenia has always sought Russia’s support to establish peace in the Caucasus, most recently relying on the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO agreement) that was signed between the two countries in 2002.

At the start of the week, Putin had two big problems on his plate: A victorious Ukrainian push in the Donbas and an expanding war in the Caucasus. As of now, it looks like the only issue left – but it is a big one – is the Ukrainian counter-offensive. That is certain to weaken him in the eyes of China, his major ally, as he is meeting Xi-Jinping today in Uzbekistan. How this will play out, as of now, is anyone’s guess, but the odds no longer look good for Putin.


Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed here by the authors are their own, not those of Impakter.com — In the Featured Photo: Russian destruction in liberated Kharkiv region Source: Screenshot from DW video

Tags: counter-offensiveDonbasPutinRussiaUkraine war
Previous Post

Can New EU Deforestation Law Help Curb Global Environmental Devastation?

Next Post

The Tyre Collective, Preventing Microplastic Pollution From Tires

Related Posts

ESG News regarding Trump backing sanctions on Russian oil buyers, Norway’s oil and gas output declining, dog food linked to UK emissions, Trump climate treaty exit facing legal scrutiny
Business

U.S. Targets Russian Oil Buyers with New Sanctions Bill

Today’s ESG Updates Trump Backs Sanctions on Russian Oil Buyers: A bipartisan U.S. bill would impose tariffs of up to...

byAnastasiia Barmotina
January 9, 2026
Unexpected Consequences of Investment Treaties in Times of War
Politics & Foreign Affairs

Unexpected Consequences of Investment Treaties in Times of War

Russian state entities are threatening to use the 1989 Belgium-Luxembourg (BLEU)–USSR bilateral investment treaty (BIT) to sue Belgium over the...

byInternational Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
December 11, 2025
ESG news regarding the US-China Trade Agreement, Australia’s new environmental protection bill, Lukoil selling international assets to a Swiss firm, and truckmakers asking the European Commission to ease carbon emissions rules
Business

The United States and China Reach Trade Agreement

Today’s ESG Updates New Trade Deal Between Trump and Xi Jinping Pauses Trade War: U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese...

bySarah Perras
October 30, 2025
Two Russian MiG31 flying in front of one another.
Live News

NATO Members Triggering Article 4: Eastern Sentry Next Steps

Recent days have seen a dramatic escalation of tensions on NATO's eastern flank, with two member states invoking Article 4...

byImpakter Editorial Board
September 22, 2025
ESG news regarding icebreaker ships in the Arctic, cattle fat as fuel alternative, Aston Martin’s ESG excellence, and Australia’s $6 billion climate investment
Business

The Race for the Arctic

Today’s ESG Updates Geopolitical Tensions Rise as Icebreaker Race Accelerates: Melting Arctic ice has triggered global competition for resources and...

bySarah Perras
September 16, 2025
poland drone attack
Politics & Foreign Affairs

Poland Was Targeted by Bigger Neighbors in 1939 and by Russia Now

Slightly more than 86 years ago, on September 1, 1939, Poland was invaded by Nazi Germany. This was the outcome...

byRichard Seifman - Former World Bank Senior Health Advisor and U.S. Senior Foreign Service Officer
September 12, 2025
ESG news regarding oil prices affected by Ukraine’s peace talks, Iraq’s new deal with Chevron, Google terms change after EU charges, Spain’s wildfires
Business

Oil Prices Surge Following Stalled Ukraine Peace Talks

Today’s ESG Updates Oil Prices Climb Amid Stalled Ukraine Peace Talks: Halted negotiations are raising supply fears and boosting oil...

byYuxi Lim
August 20, 2025
UN 2.0
Politics & Foreign Affairs

Trump’s America in Open Conflict With the World: What Next?

From launching a trade war and engaging in mass deportation of migrants to withdrawing support from the United Nations, Trump...

byClaude Forthomme - Senior Editor
August 16, 2025
Next Post
The Tyre Collective, Preventing Microplastic Pollution From Tires

The Tyre Collective, Preventing Microplastic Pollution From Tires

Recent News

ESG News regarding China restricting industrial renewable exports, UN warning that US climate treaty exit harms economy, UK firms lowering wage forecasts despite inflation, Meta partnering with TerraPower for new nuclear reactors.

To Save the Grid, China Forces Industries to Go Off-Network

January 9, 2026
Cleaner Air in Hospitals

How Cleaner Air in Hospitals Can Cut Infections and Climate Impact at the Same Time

January 9, 2026
Search cleanup, key activity to protect your data and tech devices.

A Simple “Search Cleanup” Plan for Busy People

January 9, 2026
  • ESG News
  • Sustainable Finance
  • Business

© 2025 Impakter.com owned by Klimado GmbH

No Result
View All Result
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

© 2025 Impakter.com owned by Klimado GmbH