Impakter
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Impakter
No Result
View All Result

Selective Empathy and the Media’s Responsibility to ALL Americans

byLaToya Dixon - Sociologist & Human Rights Advocate
May 9, 2017
in Politics & Foreign Affairs, Science, Society

Make America Great Again.  It was the campaign slogan that Donald Trump ran on in one of the most controversial presidential campaigns in recent history.  Trump had some characteristic campaign promises like no cuts to Medicaid or Social Security, simplifying the tax code, and providing better healthcare for all citizens. However, he also managed to tap into one of the darkest elements of American society: an intrinsic fear of diversity (made possible by the Republican party’s use of the Southern strategy). Or as most African Americans, and other minority groups call it: racism.

racial-segregation-67788_1280

In the photo:  Campaign poster from 1866 Pennsylvania gubernatorial race.  Photo credit: Pixabay

The rhetoric used by Trump eventually paid off and he was elected the 45th president of the United States.  Upon his inauguration, Trump began to make good on his many campaign promises.  He instituted two Muslim bans, through executive order (struck down by the courts both times), de-funded life-saving services at Planned Parenthood, continued the use of ICE agents to round up undocumented black and brown immigrants, and many other harmful policies directed at marginalized groups.   While these actions by Trump have gotten massive media coverage, it wasn’t until the debacle of the ACA repeal that we began to hear about the effects of certain policies on specific groups of people.


Related article: ONE FOR ALL – PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP?  by Rushna Shahid


As Trump’s harmful and dangerous executive orders and GOP policies began to roll out—it became obvious not even his voters would be excluded—media outlets began to put forward more stories about regretful Trump voters.  In one story, a Trump voter from Texas was surprised when her undocumented husband was deported since she thought only the “bad ones” (referring to undocumented immigrants) would have to leave.  Another instance is an elderly Georgia woman who stands to lose her access to Meals on Wheels, due to Trump and the GOP’s budget cuts.

When Trump voters began to realize that some of his policies would affect them, many began to pressure their representatives in Congress to object to certain nominations and policies. This was accomplished through town halls, media interviews, and phone campaigns to their representatives. The sentiment from these Trump voters appears to be the same. We knew Trump was going to do harmful things, we just didn’t think it would affect us.

25244866965_2e8c07006f_k

In this photo:  Donald Trump speaking with supporters at a campaign rally at the South Point Arena in Las Vegas, Nevada. Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore/ Flickr

The United States has yet to come to terms with (and properly rectify) its brutal history towards marginalized groups–such as African Americans, indigenous people, transgender people, women, and many others.  However, these same groups of people are often expected to empathize with those who are indifferent to their struggles.  

This is why the focus media outlets have on Trump supporters being harmed is so puzzling.  The framing of these stories suggest that more empathy should be given to those who voted for Trump IN SPITE OF his inflammatory rhetoric, as opposed to the groups he promised to harm.

What do we insinuate by focusing our attention on Trump voters being harmed by his policies, yet ignoring much of the population (who didn’t vote for him) that are being explicitly targeted by his administration?

Where are the anecdotal stories about the transgender children and adults who have been placed in greater danger by the revocation of transgender student protections by the Trump Administration? In North Carolina, this revocation combined with the pseudo repeal of the disastrous HB-2 (dubbed the “bathroom bill”) law has led many transgender youth and adults to feel unsafe and targeted with physical harm for living their lives.

Where is the empathy for undocumented black and brown immigrants who are being targeted by ICE agents using checkpoints outside of schools, daycares, etcetera? For the women who are victims of domestic violence in these communities, who won’t come forth out of fear of being deported?

5378420945_5366472408_b

Photo credit: GGAADD/Flickr

Where are the stories about African Americans, Muslims, Latinos/Hispanics, and countless others who have become victims in the increase of hate crimes since Trump was elected?

A popular quote from legendary poet and writer, Maya Angelou says, “When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.”  From his claim that Mexico was sending rapists into the U.S. to the assertion that African Americans should vote for him because they have nothing to lose, Trump has been honest about the person he truly is.

The one consistent thing about Trump, has been his adherence to harming marginalized groups.  Trump’s campaign strategy of using marginalized groups as scapegoats was more easily achieved since media outlets provided Trump with hours of coverage daily.  However, within this continuous coverage, a message was missing. If Trump was to be elected and actually did everything he said he would, how would the various marginalized groups he mentioned be affected?  

The groups being targeted by the Trump administration could probably answer this question, but it would require media outlets to pick up the stories.  The media has a large influence in what the American public decides is important.  Right now it appears that Trump voters being harmed by policies Trump promised to enact is on the list.  The U.S has a long history of ignoring and targeting its most vulnerable populations, and the effects of that position have been exploited by Trump and the Republican party.

Instead of focusing on the effects of those who willingly chose to elect a man of  questionable character to the White House, a more useful task would be to focus  on those who had/have no control over the harm inflicted on their communities by an out-of-control administration.


Recommended reading: “MORE THAN HURT FEELINGS: THE REAL DANGER OF HATE SPEECH“


EDITOR’S NOTE: The opinions expressed here by Impakter.com columnists are their own, not those of Impakter.com. Featured Photo Credit:  Jerry Kiesewetter/Unsplash
Tags: African AmericanDangers of Hate SpeechHB2HypocrisyImmigrantImpakermediaMuslimNorth CarolinarefugeethingserToya DixonTransgenderTrumpwomen
Previous Post

Inequality: A Personal Take On Economic Indicators

Next Post

Trump’s White House and the Politics of Nepotism

Related Posts

Regulatory Updates from EU Nuclear stance, AI Copyright, UK Carbon Net Zero Buildings, and US Tariffs Refunds by Customs and Border Protection
AI & MACHINE LEARNING

The Tariff Refund Saga Unfolds in Court

March 13, 2026
How Airlines Could Cut Emissions in Half Without Flying Less
Business

How Airlines Could Cut Emissions in Half Without Flying Less

March 12, 2026
Space‑Based Solar Power test
Energy

Solar Power From Space: How Close Is It to Reality?

March 11, 2026
Next Post
Trump’s White House and the Politics of Nepotism

Trump’s White House and the Politics of Nepotism

Recent News

ESG news: Trump administration's new move to enforce tariffs; Apple's App Store commission cuts; Canada's job market; and Glencore refinery workers' strike.

60 Nations Caught in New US Trade Crosshairs

March 13, 2026
Nasa picture of night on Earth with thousands of lights

AI’s Carbon Footprint Is Also a Geography Problem

March 13, 2026

Impakter informs you through the ESG news site and empowers your business CSRD compliance and ESG compliance with its Klimado SaaS ESG assessment tool marketplace that can be found on: www.klimado.com

Registered Office Address

Klimado GmbH
Niddastrasse 63,

60329, Frankfurt am Main, Germany


IMPAKTER is a Klimado GmbH website

Impakter is a publication that is identified by the following International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) is the following 2515-9569 (Printed) and 2515-9577 (online – Website).


Office Hours - Monday to Friday

9.30am - 5.00pm CEST


Email

stories [at] impakter.com

By Audience

  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & MACHINE LEARNING
    • Green Tech
  • ENVIRONMENT
    • Biodiversity
    • Energy
    • Circular Economy
    • Climate Change
  • INDUSTRY NEWS
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
    • Editorial Series

ESG/Finance Daily

  • ESG News
  • Sustainable Finance
  • Business

About Us

  • Team
  • Partners
  • Write for Impakter
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 IMPAKTER. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

© 2026 IMPAKTER. All rights reserved.