Impakter
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Impakter logo
No Result
View All Result
Production gap report

Fossil Fuel Plans Inconsistent With 1.5°C Scenario, Production Gap Report Shows

The report finds that in aggregate, government plans and projections would result in an increase in global coal production until 2030 and a rise in global oil and gas production “until at least 2050"

International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)byInternational Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
November 10, 2023
in Environment
0

Top fossil fuel producers still plan to extract more than double the amount of fossil fuels in 2030 than would be consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5°C, putting a well-managed and equitable energy transition at risk. This is the main finding of the 2023 Production Gap Report — a collaborative effort by several research and academic institutions.

The report is titled, “Phasing Down or Phasing Up? Top Fossil Fuel Producers Plan Even More Extraction Despite Climate Promises.” It finds that in aggregate, government plans and projections would result in an increase in global coal production until 2030 and a rise in global oil and gas production “until at least 2050.”

This, it underscores, is in conflict with countries’ commitments under the Paris Agreement on climate change, and contrasts with “expectations that global demand for coal, oil, and gas will peak within this decade even without new policies.”

The report notes that even though major producer countries have pledged to achieve net-zero emissions and launched initiatives towards that end, “none have committed to reduce coal, oil, and gas production in line with limiting warming to 1.5°C.”

It calls on governments to:

  • Increase transparency in their plans, projections, and support for fossil fuel production and on the alignment of such plans with national and global climate goals;
  • Adopt near- and long-term reduction targets in fossil fuel production and use, to complement other climate mitigation targets and reduce the risks of stranded assets; and
  • Aim for a near total phase-out of coal production and use by 2040 and a combined reduction in oil and gas production and use by three-quarters by 2050 from 2020 levels, with failure of these measures threatening to necessitate an even more rapid global phase-out of all fossil fuels.

At the same time, the report recognizes that “[a]n equitable transition away from fossil fuel production must recognize countries’ differentiated responsibilities and capabilities.” It urges governments with more transition capacity to aim for more ambitious reductions and help finance the transition in countries where capacities are limited.


Related Articles: Victory for Climate Movement: Oil Giant Shell Condemned by Dutch Court | US Supreme Court Dismisses Oil Giants’ Appeals in Local Climate Lawsuits | New Chapter in Climate Cases: A Win for Youth in America | UN’s Landmark Decision: Children’s Right to Sue Over Climate | Youth Activists vs Europe: A Climate Battle of Epic Proportions

The report features individual country profiles for 20 major producers of fossil fuels — Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, Germany, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Mexico, Nigeria, Norway, Qatar, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the US, and the UK.

First published in 2019, the report “tracks the misalignment between governments’ planned fossil fuel production and global production levels consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5°C or 2°C.”

The Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Climate Analytics, E3G, the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) partner on this externally peer-reviewed publication.

The 2023 report was launched on 8 November, ahead of the UN Climate Change Conference (UNFCCC COP28) in Dubai, UAE. The report complements the other two “gap reports” that address the mitigation and adaptation gaps.

— —

This article was originally published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) and is republished here as part of an editorial collaboration with the IISD. 


Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed here by the authors are their own, not those of Impakter.com — Featured Photo Credit: Zbynek Burival.

Tags: 1.5°C goalClimate ChangeCOP28Fossil fuel plansFossil FuelsIISDInternational Institute for Sustainable DevelopmentParis AgreementUN Climate Change Conference
Previous Post

ESG Is Here to Stay, Investors Say

Next Post

How Is Climate Change Affecting Consumer Behavior?

Related Posts

Protests arise against Wall street’s oil deals, Big tech accounts for half of global clean energy, EU proposes stricter standards for corporate vehicles, DHL introduces new portfolio offerings for reducing scope 3 impacts
Energy

Activists Protest Against Wall Street’s Oil Deals

Today’s ESG Updates Protests' Strategies Change Amidst Banks' Inaction: Wall Street fossil fuel deals push climate groups to shift tactics,...

byFedor Sukhoi
February 24, 2026
Trump Admin Weakens Coal Plant Mercury Regulations
Business

Trump Admin Weakens Coal Plant Mercury Regulations

Today’s ESG Updates: Coal Plants Get Reprieve on Mercury Limits: Trump's EPA is rolling back mercury emission limits to cut...

byEge Can Alparslan
February 20, 2026
How Climate Change Is Reshaping Arctic Geopolitics
Climate Change

How Climate Change Is Reshaping Arctic Geopolitics

Once a remote and largely inaccessible region, the Arctic has become the focus of far-reaching international developments. In recent years, competition among...

byPier Paolo Raimondi - Senior Researcher at the Energy, Climate and Resources (ECR) Program of the Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI)
February 20, 2026
How an Intersectional Approach Can Help Us Address Vulnerability to Climate Change
Climate Change

How an Intersectional Approach Can Help Us Address Vulnerability to Climate Change

Different forms of discrimination and marginalization — such as racism, ableism, and discrimination on the basis of gender identity —...

byInternational Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
February 20, 2026
Underwater Wall to Protect the ‘Doomsday Glacier’: Necessary Intervention or Costly Distraction?
Climate Change

Underwater Wall to Protect the ‘Doomsday Glacier’: Necessary Intervention or Costly Distraction?

Thwaites Glacier in Antarctica earned its dramatic nickname, the “Doomsday Glacier,” because its collapse could trigger a catastrophic rise in...

byBenjamin Clabault
February 19, 2026
biodiversity loss
Biodiversity

The Economics of Biodiversity Loss

In the 1990s, India’s vulture population collapsed due to the unintended knock-on effect of a veterinary drug for cattle, with...

byStefano Giglio - Professor at Yale Universityand2 others
February 19, 2026
ESG news on TotalEnergies climate trial, Heathrow SAF incentives, Shein EU probe, EU climate resilience gap
Business

TotalEnergies Climate Trial Shock

Today’s ESG Updates TotalEnergies Climate Trial: French prosecutors intervene to defend TotalEnergies in a landmark climate lawsuit, challenging environmental groups’...

byEve Rogers
February 18, 2026
Can Human Behavior Explain the Recent Spike in Shark Attacks?
Environment

Can Human Behavior Explain the Recent Spike in Shark Attacks?

In January, headlines were dominated by the four shark bites occurring within 48 hours off Australia’s coast. This is not...

byLena McDonough
February 17, 2026
Next Post
climate change consumer behavior

How Is Climate Change Affecting Consumer Behavior?

Recent News

Engie UK Power Networks acquisition and power grid infrastructure

Engie Acquires UK Power Networks in $14B Deal to Boost Grid and Decarbonization

February 26, 2026
Scholars Argue for a Pan-European Coalition to Counteract U.S. Aggression

Scholars Argue for a Pan-European Coalition to Counteract U.S. Aggression

February 26, 2026
Who Owns the Ocean’s Genetic Wealth?

Who Owns the Ocean’s Genetic Wealth?

February 26, 2026
  • ESG News
  • Sustainable Finance
  • Business

© 2025 Impakter.com owned by Klimado GmbH

No Result
View All Result
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

© 2025 Impakter.com owned by Klimado GmbH