Impakter
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Fashion & Lifestyle
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
    • Shape Your Future
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Fashion & Lifestyle
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
    • Shape Your Future
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Impakter
No Result
View All Result
Home Environment Energy

European Gas Crisis: Pressing Questions Answered

ECCO think tank experts answer questions on how Europe can wean itself off Russian gas, and at what cost

byECCO - Climate Change Think Tank
July 15, 2022
in Energy, Future of Europe Series
Free public domain CC0 photo.

Free public domain CC0 photo.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Does Europe need new gas infrastructure?

According to an Artelys study, “Does phasing-out Russian gas require new gas infrastructure?”, published in May 2022 and carried out through a simulation model of the European energy system, all that would be needed to do without Russian gas is an increase in regasification capacity in the Baltic countries and Finland, or just the controlled management of limited rationing.

Nevertheless, much of the response provided by governments to the price crisis so far consists of a rush to new investments in gas infrastructure, without any concern for their economic efficiency. This response, presented as necessary to avert blackout scenarios, ignores both business and private consumer reactions to high prices and the effects of climate policies already undertaken by the EU.

Regarding consumers’ reactions, many customers have no interest in consuming the same amount of pre-crisis energy at a wholesale price that has quintupled in the meantime. Consumers, especially after having time to organize, save energy in reaction to exceptionally high prices. In other words, it is irrational to put in place costly policies to allow a level of consumption that is no longer desirable at current prices. Short-term savings will be complemented by structural savings from increased efficiency achieved through investments triggered precisely by high prices.

Regarding policies on climate and energy transition, new capacity from renewables – in parallel to the progressive electrification of consumption – will bring gas consumption in the EU down to about 400 bmc in 2025 compared to about 480 in 2019, according to Artelys.

This reduction alone is worth about half of Russian gas imports in 2019 and will be compounded by lower consumption, additional policies and diversification of gas supplies. We estimate that actions under the European Fit for 55 and REPowerEU plans, aimed at meeting the 2030 climate targets, will reduce European gas demand by 40% by 2030.

Who would pay for new infrastructure and gas supplies?

What percentage of the cost of energy is paid for in bills and what with taxes is a political question. In general, the higher the share in the bill, the greater the empowerment of consumers, the greater the incentives for efficiency, and the greater the chances of making effective pricing policies to discriminate between fossil and non-fossil energy.

What can certainly be said is that taxpayers or consumers will pay every last euro, for decades. This includes both the costs of the infrastructure we decide to build today in the wake of the emergency and the long-term commercial supply commitments guaranteed in any form by the state.

Further, as consumption decreases, the weight of these charges per unit cost of gas — and thus its function as a “transition fuel” — will become less and less sustainable. All these costs moreover would add to those of decarbonization, whose process risks slowing down.

Governments in Europe are considering support for new long-term gas supply contracts. What are the consequent economic and climate risks?

First, there is an issue of transparency. Since gas is purchased by companies and not by governments, whenever a government provides guarantees to commercial deals, it exposes itself to risks of state aid and general opacity and conflicts of interest – all the more so if that government is a shareholder in the companies involved.

In terms of climate risk, any commitment – whether on a long-term contract or infrastructure – can make it artificially convenient in the future to prolong gas dependence. This would slow down decarbonization policies, thus leading to a negative double dividend.

Would new domestic gas production in Italy serve energy security goals?

The potential impact of new investment in domestic gas production would on the one hand be insignificant, and on the other — it would be late when it comes to Italy weaning itself off Russian gas. For more details see: ECCO Q&A: Is it worth developing Italian fossil gas?

Is new domestic and international gas production compatible with Europe’s climate goals? 

No. As the International Energy Agency (IEA) states in its guidance on the global pathway to climate neutrality, new upstream investments are inconsistent with climate policies, all the more so in richer countries. A study by Oil Change International argues that to stay within the 1.5°C carbon budget, even a portion (40%) of the world’s already developed reserves should not be used.

In other words, committing to almost completely abandon fossil fuels in just over two decades while developing new wells is nonsense — and the costs would weigh on our economies.

Consistently, on the sidelines of COP26 in Glasgow, Italy and 38 other countries pledged to avoid new international investments in fossil energy sources from the end of 2022.

What guarantees of stability do alternative gas supplier countries offer to Russia?

If we look at the geographical location of the countries considered key to supply diversification, with the exception of the United States, they are all located in the Mediterranean region and Africa. These regions are characterized by situations of fragility and risk, even where the appearance is one of stability.

Indeed, behind enduring political leadership, such as that of Algeria, or military leadership, like in Egypt, lie numerous elements of economic, political, and social fragility that risk giving rise to new instability.


Related Articles: EU to Cut Reliance on Russian Gas With New Plan | What Germany’s Soon-to-Be Independence of Russian Coal and Oil Means

But more relevant than the element of stability is that of dependency. Even where these regimes manage to survive new waves of dissent and/or systemic shocks, such as food insecurity or the looming debt crisis, the key element that Italy and Europe should reflect upon is that of creating new relationships of dependence.

By becoming dependent on these countries for gas supplies, Italy and Europe implicitly give up pressure on them to respect the norms of international law (as in the case of Israeli settlement policy) and human rights (as in the case of arbitrary detentions and enforced disappearances in Egypt). This attitude diverges from the European approach of conditionality towards adopting a principle of non-interference.

What is a strategy for secure, affordable, and sustainable energy?

Secure energy comes first and foremost from supplies where we don’t need to worry about serious negative side effects. Fossil energy in a planet grappling with the need to solve the climate crisis is therefore inherently unsafe.

But security is also the reasonable possibility of trusting the continuity of supply and its affordability. And here, again, the history of fossil fuels (oil first, gas today) is littered with scarcity shocks (and hence high prices) typically followed by severe recessions in the affected economies.

The most widely used indicator of affordability today for comparing energy costs from different sources is the LCOE (Levelized Cost Of Energy), a measure of total costs divided by the expected energy output over the life of the plant. All international observers identify renewable sources (PV and wind primarily) as having the most favorable LCOE.

The good news is that renewables are sustainable not only in terms of costs, but also when it comes to predicting these costs because they mostly relate to construction, depreciation and maintenance, with positive impacts on employment and the trade balance of today’s fossil-importing states. In addition, they are sustainable in climate and health terms.

Does getting off gas generate employment problems? 

Transition in any industry involves the need to relocate resources, human and otherwise, from shrinking to growing activities. At the same time, the best way to sustainably secure future jobs and prosperity is to encourage public and private investment in sectors that hold promise with respect to the community’s strategic goals (such as climate-proofing) and certainly not in those that are declining or incompatible with those goals.

Specifically, in the transition from a gas-based energy system (with a rather centralized supply chain) to one based on renewables (with a plurality of smaller capacity), it is likely that labor intensity will increase and new opportunities will be more distributed across the state, with virtuous distributional and social effects.

— —

Editor’s note: The original article, first published on the ECCO website, features more questions and answers than are displayed here. You may find the full Q&A here. 


Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed here by the authors are their own, not those of Impakter.com — In the Featured Photo: Gas pipeline in Europe. Featured Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons. 

Tags: EuropeGasGas CrisisitalyLNGRussian gas
Previous Post

Is SHEIN Exploiting Forced Labor? How Ethical Is the Fast Fashion Juggernaut Really?

Next Post

Another Closed Trial in Belarus: Jailed Journalist Gets 8 More Years For Alleged “State Treason”

ECCO - Climate Change Think Tank

ECCO - Climate Change Think Tank

ECCO is the first independent Italian, non-profit climate change think tank. Founded in 2021 with the mission to accelerate climate action in Italy and around the world, ECCO uses its independence and expertise to identify and promote transformative science-led climate solutions and implementation strategies. ECCO is an active agent of change, deploying strategic communication, advocacy and diplomacy to shape climate and energy politics in all forms.

Related Posts

Europe advances clean energy goals with renewables and fusion after blackout.
Energy

After the Blackout: Europe’s New Energy Future

May 9, 2025
Fossil Fuel Subsidies Energy Security
Energy

Seven Ways Fossil Fuel Subsidies Undermine Energy Security

May 9, 2025
ESG news regarding Euronext rebranding ESG, US and China to start trade talks, Harbour energy to slash UK workforce, Orsted to discontinue Hornsea 4 offshore wind project
Business

Euronext Rebrands ESG to Boost European Defence Firm Investment

May 7, 2025
Next Post
Another Closed Trial in Belarus: Jailed Journalist Gets 8 More Years For Alleged “State Treason”

Another Closed Trial in Belarus: Jailed Journalist Gets 8 More Years For Alleged “State Treason”

Recent News

ESG news regarding first commercial e-methanol plant in Denmark, IFC one-hundred-million-dollar investment in electric vehicles in Mexico, EFC gas awarded five-million-dollar contract from NASA, and germany revising energy grid

European Energy Opens First Large-Scale E-Methanol Plant

May 13, 2025
US China trade deal

Why US-China Trade Talks May Not Lead to a Comprehensive Deal

May 13, 2025
Yemen climate change

Yemen’s Climate Battle: Green Climate Fund Lays Groundwork Amid Conflict and Crisis

May 13, 2025

Impakter informs you through the ESG news site and empowers your business CSRD compliance and ESG compliance with its Klimado SaaS ESG assessment tool marketplace that can be found on: www.klimado.com

Registered Office Address

Klimado GmbH
Niddastrasse 63,

60329, Frankfurt am Main, Germany


IMPAKTER is a Klimado GmbH website

Impakter is a publication that is identified by the following International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) is the following 2515-9569 (Printed) and 2515-9577 (online – Website).


Office Hours - Monday to Friday

9.30am - 5.00pm CEST


Email

stories [at] impakter.com

By Audience

  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & MACHINE LEARNING
    • Green Tech
  • ENVIRONMENT
    • Biodiversity
    • Energy
    • Circular Economy
    • Climate Change
  • INDUSTRY NEWS
    • Entertainment
    • Fashion & Lifestyle
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
    • Editorial Series

ESG/Finance Daily

  • ESG News
  • Sustainable Finance
  • Business

Klimado Platform

  • Klimado ESG Tool
  • Impakter News

About Us

  • Team
  • Global Leaders
  • Partners
  • Write for Impakter
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© 2025 IMPAKTER. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Fashion & Lifestyle
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
    • Shape Your Future
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

© 2024 IMPAKTER. All rights reserved.