Impakter
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Fashion & Lifestyle
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Fashion & Lifestyle
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Impakter
No Result
View All Result
Home Society Health

When being Ugly was Illegal

byProvidenza Loera Rocco
March 22, 2017
in Health, Society
Impakter, Ugly
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Your momma’s so ugly that she literally could be fined for walking in the streets!

No, seriously. Not that long ago in America, in the early to mid-1900s, it was illegal to be found ugly in the streets of cities like Chicago.

noah-rosenfield-41536

PHOTO CREDIT: Noah Rosenfield

In Portland, Oregon, Mother Hastings, as she was commonly known, was condemned by authorities as “too terrible a sight for the children to see.” Mother Hastings told a local reporter that she believed the authorities meant that her crippled hands were too unattractive for the town. The authorities gave her money to skip town, to save Portland from her unsightly hands, so she moved to Los Angeles. 

Portland’s law targeted panhandling, with a strict emphasis on “unsightliness.” These ordinances were strictly enforced and penalties included fines or even jail time. 

In 1881, Chicago’s Alderman, James Peevy, had a lofty goal–he wanted to rid Chicago of all “street obstructions.” And by street obstructions he meant beggars, “the one-legged individual who, with dropping eye and painfully lugubrious countenance, holds forth his hat for pennies” or “the fellows who yell ‘ba-na-naas’” and “the woman with two sick children who was drawn through the carding-machine in a woolen mill, and who grinds ‘Mollie Darling’ incessantly on a hurdy-gurdy on a street corner.” He was descriptive, I’ll give Peevy that.

Reformers who wrote and enforced these laws truly believed they were doing the right thing–don’t they all? They were trying to rid the city of menacing, unsightly beggars, and improve the city’s appeal. But the problem was that these menacing and unsightly beggars were city residents, disabled people, who were ostracized and even punished for their physical characteristics. At this time, there also was a idea of the deserving and undeserving poor–folks who deserved assistance and folks who clearly did not. Unfortunately, due to physical appearance, the poor and disabled fell into the undeserving category. 


Related article: “THE FLYING TRAVELER“


This was a dark time in American history indeed because the poor and disabled were targeted and ostracized for being, well, poor and disabled. It was not until after World War I when soldiers returned from battle with missing limbs that people’s’ minds began to change. Nonetheless, Chicago’s laws stayed on the books for over 90 years. 

There’s a big problem when the  us-them distinction gets made, especially in terms of the law. Whether we are criminalizing aesthetics, building a wall, banning refugees, or even giving the CDC power to quarantine we should be very careful.

ugly, impakter

PHOTO CREDIT: R. McGuire/ Gratisography

What’s that again?

In January 2017, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued new regulations that gave it broad authority to quarantine Americans.  According to The New York Times, and one of my former mentors, Scott Burris, renowned health law expert from Temple University’s Beasley School of Law, the rules “outline for the first time how the federal government can restrict interstate travel during a health crisis, and they establish in-house oversight of whether someone should be detained, without providing a clear and direct path to challenge a quarantine order in federal court.” 

This new broad authority is frightening indeed, especially with a self-proclaimed germophobe  President who likes broad powers. President Trump tweeted during the Ebola crisis in 2014, “The U.S. cannot allow EBOLA infected people back. People that go to far away places to help out are great-but must suffer the consequences.” 

The ‘Times’ points out that:

“Until now, most quarantines have been imposed by states and local governments, which have primary responsibility for protecting the health of their populations. . . . Unfortunately, the new rules give the C.D.C. significant in-house oversight of the decision to quarantine, with up to three layers of internal agency review. This internal review has no explicit time limit and could easily stretch on for week while a healthy person languishes in quarantine.. . .In addition, the C.D.C. now has clear authority to take over the quarantine role from states in many cases, and to restrict interstate travel.”

The “ugly laws” were made in a good-faith effort to help society be more healthy, clean, and vigorous. The C.D.C.’s new quarantine authority also probably was made in a good-faith effort to keep American citizens healthy. But beware if an us-them distinction gets made–who knows which one of us will end up in quarantine.


Recommended reading: “TRUMP POPULISM: A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY?“


EDITOR’S NOTE: THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED HERE BY IMPAKTER.COM COLUMNISTS ARE THEIR OWN, NOT THOSE OF IMPAKTER.COM.  FEATURE PHOTO CREDIT: Pexels
Tags: CDCCenters for Disease Control and PreventionChicago LawsChicago's AldermanEbola crisis in 2014ImpakterJames PeevyMother HastingsPortland OregonPresident TrumpProvidenza (Enza) RoccoquarantineScott BurrisTemple University’s Beasley School of LawthingserUgly Lawsunsightliness
Previous Post

Regenerating Rome’s Urban Fabric: Interview with Nathalie Grenon

Next Post

Upholding International Human Rights Law: Internationally, Nationally and Individually

Providenza Loera Rocco

Providenza Loera Rocco

Enza is an Assistant Professor of Bioethics in the Center for Bioethics, Urban Health, and Policy, at the Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, where she also serves as the Assistant Director of the MA Urban Bioethics Program. She specializes in urban bioethics and legal and ethical issues in end-of-life care. Enza earned her master's in Social Work and her master's in Bioethics from the University of Pennsylvania, and she earned her law degree from Temple University Beasley School of Law. Enza also teaches at Simmons School of Social Work where she teaches courses in social policy. Additionally, she serves on the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Foundation Board of Directors. She is the proud mom of Joseph, age 2 and Nicoletta, age 1. She lives with her husband, kids, and two dogs in Philadelphia.

Related Posts

Under the current crypto market landscape, questions are raised on the ethical correctness of crypto
Business

Is Crypto Corrupt?

May 15, 2025
boom overture supersonic jet
Business

Supersonic Renaissance: Can Speed and Sustainability Coexist?

May 14, 2025
freediving
Society

What Freediving Can Teach Us About Training With Compassion

May 14, 2025
Next Post
human rights, UN, Impakter

Upholding International Human Rights Law: Internationally, Nationally and Individually

Recent News

EU and China strengthen sustainable finance ties amid geopolitical tensions.

The Great Recalibration: EU and China Talk Green Money

May 16, 2025
South Korea Fines JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Nomura and UBS

Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan Slash US Recession Odds Amid Tariff Truce

May 16, 2025
ESG News regarding EU Charges TikTok Over Ad Transparency Breaches

EU Targets TikTok Over Online Ad Transparency Violations

May 15, 2025

Impakter informs you through the ESG news site and empowers your business CSRD compliance and ESG compliance with its Klimado SaaS ESG assessment tool marketplace that can be found on: www.klimado.com

Registered Office Address

Klimado GmbH
Niddastrasse 63,

60329, Frankfurt am Main, Germany


IMPAKTER is a Klimado GmbH website

Impakter is a publication that is identified by the following International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) is the following 2515-9569 (Printed) and 2515-9577 (online – Website).


Office Hours - Monday to Friday

9.30am - 5.00pm CEST


Email

stories [at] impakter.com

By Audience

  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & MACHINE LEARNING
    • Green Tech
  • ENVIRONMENT
    • Biodiversity
    • Energy
    • Circular Economy
    • Climate Change
  • INDUSTRY NEWS
    • Entertainment
    • Fashion & Lifestyle
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
    • Editorial Series

ESG/Finance Daily

  • ESG News
  • Sustainable Finance
  • Business

Klimado Platform

  • Klimado ESG Tool
  • Impakter News

About Us

  • Team
  • Global Leaders
  • Partners
  • Write for Impakter
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© 2025 IMPAKTER. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Fashion & Lifestyle
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

© 2024 IMPAKTER. All rights reserved.