Impakter
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Impakter logo
No Result
View All Result
On the Ground at the Georgia Hand Recount

On the Ground at the Georgia Hand Recount

Daniel P. FranklinbyDaniel P. Franklin
January 14, 2021
in Equal Rights, Global Leaders, Politics & Foreign Affairs
0

Last November I volunteered to serve as an observer in Georgia for a non-governmental organization that specializes in monitoring elections in burgeoning democracies around the world.  This was the first time it had agreed to do so in the United States. It is suggestive of the state of elections in our country that we now require election monitoring of a kind more common in Myanmar than in the state of Georgia.

I was assigned to monitor the hand recount in Muscogee County, Columbus, Georgia.  Columbus is a small city in Central Georgia across the Chattahoochee River from Alabama.  The registered voting population of Muscogee County is about 130,000, of which 81,000 actually cast a ballot in this election.  According to the first machine tabulation of the vote, the county went overwhelmingly to President-Elect Joe Biden, by 61% to 37%.

Regardless of the results of the 2020 presidential election, Georgia was due for a hand recount because last year’s elections were the first test of a new hybrid Dominion voting system, consisting of computer scanners and paper ballots.  Participants “voted” by touchscreen which then generated a paper ballot that listed the voter’s choices in addition to a machine-readable barcode that was scanned for voter intent. The voter then checked the ballot for accuracy and fed it into a bin that resembled a large garbage can. The ballots were scanned as they were inserted into the ballot box, providing election administrators with a paper trail to verify the machine counted vote.

Originally the State was scheduled to conduct a hand count audit on a random sample of ballots large enough to demonstrate accuracy within a statistically significant range.  However, because the election was so close and would most likely require a recount, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger decided to replace the audit with a full statewide hand recount. 

That decision was announced on Nov. 11, 2020, and was set to start the next day. I was in town for a two-day audit and ended up monitoring the full four-day recount.

In the Photo: At the elections warehouse in Fulton County, GA elections workers inspect voting machine memory cards that stored ballots after the Senate runoff election in Atlanta, GA on Jan. 5, which saw Democrat’s Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossof win both seats, allowing Democrats to take control of the Senate. Photo Credit: Ben Gray.

In Georgia, the primary responsibility for running elections devolves to the counties. According to guidelines set by the Secretary of State, every ballot had to be seen by two sets of eyes.  These “auditors” would have to work without pay, which pushed Muscogee County Supervisor of Elections Nancy Boren to find an interesting solution.  She called on Democratic and Republican party representatives from the county to supply the volunteers for the Audit Boards. 

There would be one Republican and one Democrat on each Board which turned out to be an inspired decision because it enhanced overall confidence in the result.  Only two other counties, out of 159, did the same.

One Democratic auditor told me that her counterpart turned to her at some point and said, “I think I could like you.”

The mail-in ballots were the first to count and they were particularly difficult because voters made a good number of mistakes. Due to the pandemic, there was an unusually large number of mail-in ballots cast. In Georgia, of approximately  5 million votes cast in the 2020 General election, a little more than 1.3 million were absentee.

In a small percentage of absentee ballots, the voter’s intent in voting for president was unclear.  There were overvotes (voting for more than one candidate), undervotes (voting for no one), ballots where the marks were unclear, ballots that were torn, ballots with coffee stains, write-in votes for non-qualified candidates (Jesus was a popular choice but he failed to register as a write-in candidate) and someone even sent in an absentee ballot from the primary election. 

Even so, the amount of disputed or damaged mail-in ballots were below the 1 percent range of all mail-in ballots.  There were almost no disputed machine-generated ballots.


Related Articles: Trump and Mail-In Voting | How Racist is the American Political System? 

Putting Democrats and Republicans together to work had an interesting effect.  There was very little reason to believe that there was any fraud going on in this particular county and it put party activists in close proximity to one another.  One Democratic auditor told me that her counterpart turned to her at some point and said, “I think I could like you.”

When I asked one of the Republican auditors what she thought of the process, she told me that the counting was fair and well organized,  but she believed that all they were doing was “counting pieces of paper.”  She had no idea where these ballots had come from and whether the voters who cast them were “legal”.  Another auditor suspected foul play and wondered how the much larger Fulton County,  located at the heart of the Atlanta Metro region, finished counting so quickly. 

Doing the math clarifies that question: Fulton County had 172 Audit Boards with 524,000 votes to count while Muscogee County had eight with 81,000 votes to count. 

After the mail-in ballots, Muscogee counted the ballots cast on election day. There were only about 13,000 votes on the day of the election, roughly 24,000 mail-in ballots, and 44,000 early voting, in-person ballots. From the observer’s standpoint, it appeared that roughly 60% of the “day of” ballots were Republican, 75% of mail-in ballots were Democratic, with the early votes being close to fifty-fifty but leaning Democratic.  

Based on the results of the hand recount, the Secretary of State concluded that the original count was substantially accurate thus establishing the validity of the new machines.  Studies have shown that hand recounts can expose an error rate of up to 2%.  According to the Secretary of State, the error rate of the Georgia hand recount was .73%.  This was with the exception of a number of unreported votes discovered mainly in Floyd County, Rome, Georgia. Floyd County is bedrock Republican and President Trump picked up about 1600 votes from the glitch, far less than he needed to overcome his 14,000-vote deficit. 

While it is troubling that there were still disparities in the results this wasn’t due to the machines and it wasn’t the fault of either party — it was the result of human error.  Poll workers simply forgot to properly download the results of part of the count.

Even so, when Republicans didn’t get the result they wanted, many turned on Secretary Raffensperger for doing his job. As we all saw, this unsubstantiated belief culminated on January 6, when Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol in order to impede the certification of the results of a free and fair election.

——

Daniel P. Franklin is an Associate Professor (Emeritus), retired from Georgia State University.  He is the author of seven books including Pitiful Giants: Presidents in their Final Term.

 


Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed here by Impakter.com columnists are their own, not those of Impakter.com. — In the Featured Photo: A map shows which cities in the state of Georgia voted for President Donald Trump or President-elect Joe Biden. President-elect Biden won the state by .3% due to Democratic leads in the cities of Augusta, Athens, Atlanta, Columbus, Macon and Savannah. Featured Photo Credit: Politico.  

 

 

Tags: BLMElection AdministratorsGeorgia Hand RecountPresident Donald TrumpPresident-elect Joe BidenU.S. 2020 Presidential Election
Previous Post

The World Needs to Wake Up: At Risk the Survival of Humanity

Next Post

The Top 5 Green Building Words of 2020

Related Posts

ESG news regarding big banks reversing ESG strategy, car manufacturers pool emissions with tesla, fast food giant rethinking DEI, JSE catching up on ESG regulations.
ESG FINANCE

Big Banks Change Course Adhering With Trump

Today's ESG updates: McDonald’s: Rebrands diversity team as Global Inclusion Team, emphasizing belonging, culture, and accountability after a civil rights...

byDaniel P. Franklin
January 9, 2025
ESG news regarding the future of solar energy under Trump, the International Football team’s ESG advancement, growing CSRD software market.
Climate Change

A New Dawn for Solar Energy: Will “Drill Baby Drill” Put Clean Energy Out of Business?

Today’s ESG updates: Solar energy faces challenges under Trump as the focus shifts back to fossil fuels. An international football...

byDaniel P. Franklin
November 11, 2024
American education
Education

Failures of the American Education System: The ‘States’ Rights’ Myth and the History of Racism in America

Last month marked 158 years since the United States Civil War came to an end. Yet, the American education system...

byDaniel P. Franklin
May 9, 2023
A Year On From January 6, 2021
Politics & Foreign Affairs

A Year On From January 6, 2021

January 6, 2021 was a day that should live long in the American conscience. Spurred on by months of misinformation...

byDaniel P. Franklin
January 16, 2022
Meritocracy: The Tyranny of Merit and the Dilemma of the Disinherited 
Equal Rights

Meritocracy: The Tyranny of Merit and the Dilemma of the Disinherited 

Should we take meritocracy as a given? Or is there another, better way to organize society? One that would avoid...

byDaniel P. Franklin
June 4, 2021
COVID-19 Threatens Gains from Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
Equal Rights

COVID-19 Threatens Gains from Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act

As BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Color) women across the U.S. continue to observe Equal Pay Day in the coming...

byDaniel P. Franklin
April 13, 2021
COVID-19 Deepens Structural Inequities in American Special Education
Children

COVID-19 Deepens Structural Inequities in American Special Education

When Impakter first asked me to write a piece on special education, race, and the COVID-19 pandemic, I knew what...

byDaniel P. Franklin
February 5, 2021
Notes from America’s 2021 Presidential Inauguration
Equal Rights

Notes from America’s 2021 Presidential Inauguration

At last weeks presidential inauguration, Vice President Kamala Harris took the oath of office and made history yet again in...

byDaniel P. Franklin
January 26, 2021
Next Post
The Top 5 Green Building Words of 2020

The Top 5 Green Building Words of 2020

Recent News

ESG news regarding Chris Wright warning IEA, Alcoa paying A$55 million for illegal bauxite mining in Western Australia, GEAPP raising $100 million to digitise India’s electricity grids, and U.S. and Japan unveiling $36 billion energy and minerals investment plan.

U.S. Threatens IEA Withdrawal Over Renewable Energy Focus

February 18, 2026
Trump’s Board of Peace Can Provide a New Opportunity for the United Nations

Trump’s Board of Peace Can Provide a New Opportunity for the United Nations

February 18, 2026
Migration Policy in Europe: Greece and Spain Take Divergent Paths

Migration Policy in Europe: Greece and Spain Take Divergent Paths

February 18, 2026
  • ESG News
  • Sustainable Finance
  • Business

© 2025 Impakter.com owned by Klimado GmbH

No Result
View All Result
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

© 2025 Impakter.com owned by Klimado GmbH