Impakter
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Fashion & Lifestyle
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Fashion & Lifestyle
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Impakter
No Result
View All Result
Home Environment Climate Change

Are Australia’s Climate Policies Failing? Carbon Credit Scheme Falls Short

One in five of the country’s carbon credits are “junk”, according to new report

byCharles Kershaw
September 23, 2021
in Climate Change, Corporations, Environment, Green Tech, Politics & Foreign Affairs
Carbon credit deforestation
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

One in five of the carbon credits issued by Australia’s government, making up a core part of Australia’s climate policy, have been found to be “junk”, according to a new report.

A report by the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) found that many of the carbon credits created by the government have not made an impact on reducing deforestation. This is because many of the areas supposedly protected by these credits were never going to be cleared.

The Australian government has committed to buying 26.3 million carbon credits, which the ACF estimates will use $310 million of taxpayer money. 

The buying of carbon credits aims to reduce deforestation by paying the landholders not to remove vegetation from their land, helping to stop the rise of carbon emissions. At the same time, it grants the landholder the right to emit a certain amount of carbon dioxide.

Richie Merzian, Climate & Energy Program Director at the Australia Institute, compared the scheme to “pay[ing] non-smokers to stop smoking”.


Related Articles: Trade Associations Speak on Carbon Pricing. Will Action Follow? | How Not to Introduce a Carbon Tax: The Australia Example | How Pakistan Can Benefit from China’s Carbon Markets

What’s more, the number of carbon credits suggests a level of land-clearing at nearly 750% above the current rate, according to the report. This figure, however, could be as high as 12,000%. To put it another way, it would take 128 to 1,936 years to clear this amount of land. 

Merzian has also called on the emissions reduction minister to “hit pause” on these types of emission reductions agreements. 

One in five carbon credits issued by the Federal Government’s $4.5 billion Emission Reduction Fund (ERF) do not represent real abatement and are essentially ‘junk’ credits. via @AnnicaSchooACF and @RichieMerzian 👉 https://t.co/T5EEULCfVj

— Australian Conservation Foundation (@AusConservation) September 21, 2021

Just another climate failure for the Australian government?

The Australian government has come under fire in the past for its track record on climate. This project is part of the government’s Climate Solutions Fund (CSF), a $2 billion investment that pays farms and businesses not to pollute. 

But this is very similar to the 2014 Emissions Reductions Fund, a $4.5 billion public project that was seen by many as a huge waste of public money. This fund also involved giving companies and polluters carbon credits. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has even described the CSF as “‘a recipe for fiscal recklessness”.

Many view the current climate goals as not nearly ambitious enough. A senior climate official from the US described Australia’s pledge to reduce emissions by 26-28% of 2005 levels as not sufficient”. 

The Climate Change Performance Index has also ranked Australia as last for its climate policy, out of the 57 countries most responsible for the rise in carbon emissions.

Despite this, Current Prime Minister Scott Morrison has resisted calls to toughen climate policy, stating that the country is on target to hit net zero emissions.

carbon market
The carbon market aims to tax polluters, but is not a climate ‘quick fix’. Photo Credit: Alexander Tsang

Is the Carbon Market the Best Way to Tackle Climate Change?

The carbon market, which includes carbon credits, offsets, and pricing, shines a light on the difficulty of any kind of climate pledge not tied to tangible consequences. These carbon credits were provided in good faith, with the hopes that the landholders were in fact going to clear their land before they purchased credits. If done incorrectly, carbon offsets and credits can mean that governments pay polluters to pollute just as much as before.

Some might see this report as a good reason for the Australian government to move away from carbon offsets and pricing, towards other methods of climate action. While the carbon market can seem appealing, this is just another indicator that we cannot simply buy our way out of the climate crisis. 


Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed here by Impakter.com columnists are their own, not those of Impakter.com. — In the Featured Photo: Deforestation. Featured Photo Credit: Free-Photos.

Tags: australiaCarbon Creditscarbon marketClimate Changeclimate policy
Previous Post

What’s The UN General Assembly Got to Do With It?

Next Post

Angela Merkel: The Case for More Scientific Politicians

Charles Kershaw

Charles Kershaw

Charles Kershaw is an editorial intern at Impakter from Surrey, UK. He is a recent graduate in International Journalism from City University, in London. He has written many articles for local and student papers, and hopes to pursue a career in journalism. He enjoys writing about environmental issues and international affairs. When he is not writing he enjoys mountain biking, rock climbing and walking his two dogs.

Related Posts

What Makes Today’s Debt Crisis so Pernicious?
Environment

What Makes Today’s Debt Crisis so Pernicious?

May 20, 2025
US President Donald Trump
Politics & Foreign Affairs

Trump Is the Symptom of Deeper American Malaise

May 16, 2025
boom overture supersonic jet
Business

Supersonic Renaissance: Can Speed and Sustainability Coexist?

May 14, 2025
Next Post
Angela Merkel

Angela Merkel: The Case for More Scientific Politicians

Recent News

Only 8% of Italian Enterprises Use AI: Italy Lacks Digital Knowledge

Only 8% of Italian Enterprises Use AI: Italy Lacks Digital Knowledge

May 21, 2025
nature stress

Can Nature Help Us Cope With Stress?

May 21, 2025
ESG news regarding EU and UK pension funds double down on ESG, extreme weather hits EU farmers hard, Barratt London launches Passivhaus homes, Warner bRos. Downgraded to junk

Largest European and UK Pension Funds Review Failed-Sustainability Asset Managers

May 21, 2025

Impakter informs you through the ESG news site and empowers your business CSRD compliance and ESG compliance with its Klimado SaaS ESG assessment tool marketplace that can be found on: www.klimado.com

Registered Office Address

Klimado GmbH
Niddastrasse 63,

60329, Frankfurt am Main, Germany


IMPAKTER is a Klimado GmbH website

Impakter is a publication that is identified by the following International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) is the following 2515-9569 (Printed) and 2515-9577 (online – Website).


Office Hours - Monday to Friday

9.30am - 5.00pm CEST


Email

stories [at] impakter.com

By Audience

  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & MACHINE LEARNING
    • Green Tech
  • ENVIRONMENT
    • Biodiversity
    • Energy
    • Circular Economy
    • Climate Change
  • INDUSTRY NEWS
    • Entertainment
    • Fashion & Lifestyle
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
    • Editorial Series

ESG/Finance Daily

  • ESG News
  • Sustainable Finance
  • Business

Klimado Platform

  • Klimado ESG Tool
  • Impakter News

About Us

  • Team
  • Global Leaders
  • Partners
  • Write for Impakter
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

© 2025 IMPAKTER. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Fashion & Lifestyle
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

© 2024 IMPAKTER. All rights reserved.