Shop on Impakter Eco
  • Women
  • Men
  • Kids
  • Beautycare
  • Home & Living
  • Food & Drinks
  • Pets
Impakter
  • Shop Eco
  • Culture
    • Art
    • Cinema
    • Entertainment
    • Literature
    • Music
    • Photography
  • Style
    • Architecture
    • Design
    • Fashion
    • Foodscape
    • Lifestyle
  • Society
    • Business
    • Environment
    • Foreign Affairs & Politics
    • Health
    • Tech
    • Science
    • Start-up
  • Impact
    • Eco Life
    • Circular Economy
    • COP26
    • CityLife
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
    • Sustainability Series
      • SDGs Series
      • Shape Your Future
      • 2030: Dream or Reality
    • Philanthropy
      • United Nations
      • NGO & Charities
      • Essays
    • Your Voice
      • Empower Earth
      • Empower Equality
  • SUSTAINABILITY INDEX
  • Startup-Hub
    • Companies
    • Investors
    • Organisations
    • Jobs
    • Events
  • Partners
  • About
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Contributors
    • Write for Impakter
    • IMPAKTER Italy
    • Republishing Content
    • Permissions and Copyright
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Impakter
No Result
View All Result
Home Society Politics & Foreign Affairs

Can the Digital Services Act Live Up to Its Promise to Protect Users?

A new policy paper released by the EU could revolutionize the relationship between tech companies and institutions, provided enforcement is effective

Leonardo BartolibyLeonardo Bartoli
April 26, 2022
in Politics & Foreign Affairs, Tech
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Saturday could well become a turning point in the history of relations between the tech world and institutions, as the European Union reached an agreement on the Digital Services Act, a piece of legislation that would better protect users’ fundamental rights online.

The Act harmonizes rules and creates a level-playing field against providers of illegal content and restricts tech giants’ operations to avoid sharing divisive content and ads targeted through sensitive information.

The structure of the Digital Services Act 

The text includes regulations for different online actors, depending on their role, size and impact:

  • Intermediary services (Internet Access Providers)
  • Hosting services (Hosting Services)
  • Online platforms (Online marketplaces or social media platforms)
  • Very large online platforms (tech giants like Google or Meta)

The obligations included in the policy papers are organized cumulatively so that the bigger the organization is, the larger the set of rules and restrictions is. 

For example, transparency in reporting and collaboration with national regulating authorities is required by every actor. Ads targeted to children are banned for any online platform regardless of the size, while certain obligations are exclusive to very large platforms.

Examples include drafting codes of conduct and engage in crisis response cooperation, as crises like the Ukrainian war or the covid pandemic showed how the internet could add to the impact of an emergency by spreading disinformation or aiding online frauds. Moreover, users will be able to choose not to have recommendations based on profiling, and such platforms will be required to share precise data on their work with authorities and researchers.

Can it work? It all boils down to enforcement

Around 200 people will be hired to enforce the new laws, and some commentators consider such a figure as inadequate to challenge global companies, which have an almost infinite set of resources to counter them. 

Without proper enforcement, the new laws will remain bold statements of principle and fail to impact concretely.

The criticism is in part sustained by the evolution of the G.D.P.R. legislation established in 2018, as in that context, online operators circumvented rules on data protection by spamming consent pop-ups. Many users, faced with an avalanche of pop-ups, found themselves quickly agreeing to anything just to get them out of the way and “get on with it”.  

Related Articles: EU Makes Progress on Digital Regulations, Challenging Big Tech |

The critical difference in approach in the enforcement of these two policy acts is how they are implemented: the Digital Services Act enforcement will be carried out in Brussels directly by the European Commission, while previous pieces of legislation on online regulations were left to be monitored by national authorities.

Another recurrent criticism is that fines imposed by these acts have little effect on tech giants, which generate annually immense levels of income. However, the European Commission has the authority to charge fines that amount to 6% of global revenue, and in any case, reputational damage is believed to be a much scarier threat for multinational companies.

Yes, we have a deal!

With the #DSA, the time of big online platforms behaving like they are “too big to care” is coming to an end.

A major milestone for 🇪🇺citizens.

Congratulations to the European Parliament & Council and thank you to the great EU team working countless hours! pic.twitter.com/jmCoZMQ3lO

— Thierry Breton (@ThierryBreton) April 23, 2022

The Act would take force from next year, making it the most severe attempt at regulation of online markets and services to date. Implementation details on the text still have to be worked out, and companies could have a say in this. Google claimed that it supports the general goals of the Act and that it will work closely with policymakers to make sure that final rules are implemented in a way that is not detrimental to the goals of the text itself. Indeed, the Act could harm smaller businesses or the whole European digital market.

Whatever the detailed rules and the enforcement mechanism will be, the Act is viewed as an urgent necessity by the public at large. This, other than being a general instinctive feeling, is also a fact confirmed by statistics.

According to the open public consultation on the digital services act, 92% of respondents believe transparency from service providers is essential to protect users’ freedom of expression. Moreover, 65% believe the internet is not safe for use.

According to Statista, Millenials spend between 4 and 5 hours on the internet each day. Putting together  the two statistical findings above, one sees that vast portions of society feel exploited and in danger for a quarter of their daily activities.

That includes the time spent reading this article.


Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed here by Impakter.com columnists are their own, not those of Impakter.com. — In the Featured Photo: The president of the European Commission Ursula Von Der Leyen. Featured Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons.

Tags: digitial services actEUEuropeonline securitytech giants
Previous Post

The Fight to Defend the Amazon Rainforest is Getting New Support

Next Post

‘We Have Nowhere Else to Go’: Thousands of Maasai Face Eviction From Their Ancestral Lands

Leonardo Bartoli

Leonardo Bartoli

Leonardo studies International Politics and Government at Bocconi University and has recently returned to Milan after completing an exchange program at Sciences Po in Reims. He has developed a passion for journalism looking at how impactful certain stories can be if told in the right way. His interests revolve around humanitarian crises, conflict and migration as in general he is drawn by the human side of political phenomena.

Related Posts

XFarm Technologies Raises $17 M In One Of The Largest Agritech Rounds To Date
Agriculture

XFarm Technologies Raises $17 M In One Of The Largest Agritech Rounds To Date

August 10, 2022
Taiwan Crisis: China Ends Military Drills, Withdraws Promise to Not Send Troops to Taiwan “After Unification”
Politics & Foreign Affairs

Taiwan Crisis: China Ends Military Drills, Withdraws Promise to Not Send Troops to Taiwan “After Unification”

August 10, 2022
Good Morning America: The Fight Against Climate Change Leaps Forward 
Climate Change

Good Morning America: The Fight Against Climate Change Leaps Forward 

August 10, 2022
Next Post
‘We Have Nowhere Else to Go’: Thousands of Maasai Face Eviction From Their Ancestral Lands

‘We Have Nowhere Else to Go’: Thousands of Maasai Face Eviction From Their Ancestral Lands

Recent News

eco-friendly packaging

Top Eco-Friendly Packaging Ideas for Your Biz

August 10, 2022
XFarm Technologies Raises $17 M In One Of The Largest Agritech Rounds To Date

XFarm Technologies Raises $17 M In One Of The Largest Agritech Rounds To Date

August 10, 2022
Taiwan Crisis: China Ends Military Drills, Withdraws Promise to Not Send Troops to Taiwan “After Unification”

Taiwan Crisis: China Ends Military Drills, Withdraws Promise to Not Send Troops to Taiwan “After Unification”

August 10, 2022
impakter-logo-light

Impakter informs you through the eco news site and empowers your sustainable lifestyle with its eco products marketplace.

Visit here IMPAKTER ECO for your eco products needs.

Registered Office Address

32 Lots Road, London
SW10 0QJ, United Kingdom


IMPAKTER Limited

Company number: 10806931

Impakter is a publication that is identified by the following International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) is the following 2515-9569 (Printed) and 2515-9577 (online – Website).


Office Hours - Monday to Friday

9.30am - 5.00pm CEST


Email

stories [at] impakter.com

About Us

  • Team
  • Contributors
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Partners

By Audience

  • Lifestyle
  • Green Finance
  • Culture
  • Society
  • Style
  • Impact

Impakter Platforms

  • Media
  • Up
  • Index
  • Eco for Sellers
  • Impakter Pro

© 2022 IMPAKTER. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Culture
  • Style
  • Society
  • Impact
  • ECO Products Shop – Try now!
  • INDEX – Sustainability Index
  • UP – Startup Hub
  • About
    • Partners
    • Team
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
Impakter.com uses cookies to enhance your experience when visiting the website and to serve you with advertisements that might interest you. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.