Shop on Impakter Eco
  • Women
  • Men
  • Kids
  • Beautycare
  • Home & Living
  • Food & Drinks
  • Pets
Impakter
Shop on Eco Shop
  • Shop Eco
  • Culture
    • Art
    • Cinema
    • Entertainment
    • Literature
    • Music
    • Photography
  • Style
    • Architecture
    • Design
    • Fashion
    • Foodscape
    • Lifestyle
  • Society
    • Business
    • Environment
    • Foreign Affairs & Politics
    • Health
    • Tech
    • Science
    • Start-up
  • Impact
    • Eco Life
    • Circular Economy
    • COP26
    • CityLife
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
    • Sustainability Series
      • SDGs Series
      • Shape Your Future
      • 2030: Dream or Reality
    • Philanthropy
      • United Nations
      • NGO & Charities
      • Essays
    • Your Voice
      • Empower Earth
      • Empower Equality
  • SUSTAINABILITY INDEX
  • Startup-Hub
    • Companies
    • Investors
    • Organisations
    • Jobs
    • Events
  • Partners
  • About
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Contributors
    • Write for Impakter
    • IMPAKTER Italy
    • Republishing Content
    • Permissions and Copyright
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Impakter
No Result
View All Result
Home Society Business

Do S&P 500 Companies Align with ESG Criteria from MSCI and Impakter’s Index?

And If So, Are They Truly Sustainable?

Kenya BenitezbyKenya Benitez
February 17, 2022
in Business, Green Finance
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Standard and Poor’s 500, or simply the S&P 500 is one of the largest stock market indexes and one of the most popular. Do S&P 500 listed companies follow ESG Criteria? And even if so, should we look also at other resources when evaluating a company?

In this article, we will talk about ESG Criteria but also have a look at the findings of the Impakter Index. A look at those two will give a better view of the S&P 500 companies.

What are ESG Criteria?

According to Investopedia, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria are a set of standards for a company’s operations. In other words, the ESG criteria help people take a more socially conscious approach when investing. The criteria are separated into three categories: environmental, social, and governance. Each area focuses on even smaller issues.

Environmental Criteria – Evaluates how a company takes on environmental challenges:

Energy Use, pollution, waste management, resource conservation, treatment of animals.

Social Criteria – Consider companies’ business relationships:

Customer Satisfaction, data security, fair labor trades, interest from stockholders.

Governance – Focuses on the standards that run the company:

Diversity of Board Members, corporate transparency, CEO Independence from Board Chair.

Evaluating a Company’s ESG Criteria Using the MSCI’s Website

How can you decide whether an S&P 500 company follows ESG criteria? One way is by looking at the ESG rating on the MSCI website. It is the largest ESG rating company in the world, the one investors have regular recourse to, in large part because it is very easy to use: The ratings range from C to AAA. C is the worst rating and AAA is the best.

Take Microsoft, for instance. Its ESG rating is AAA. This shows that the company is a leader for other companies to follow. In contrast, Meta, previously known as Facebook Inc., has a poor ESG rating of B. This makes the company a poor performer by ESG standards. 

There are problems however with MSCI that were recently revealed in a ground-breaking Bloomberg investigative article that made waves. Entitled The ESG Mirage it argued that MSCI “doesn’t even try to measure the impact of a corporation on the world” bringing conclusive evidence to support this affirmation; and it concluded that “it’s all about whether the world might mess with the bottom line.”


RELATED ARTICLES: Working At The Intersection Of Sustainability And Profitability | COP26 – Now The Talking’s Done, Let’s Get To Work! | Bridging The Green Gap – The Role Of Central Banks | Is $100 Billion in Climate Finance Enough to Offset Climate Damage? |

Impakter Sustainability Index: Going Beyond ESG Criteria

Leaving aside MSCI, potential investors can explore the Impakter Sustainability Index. Unlike MSCI, Impakter’s index evaluates a company’s ESG actions and policies using mega-evaluation techniques that pull together in a single rating the findings of the most widely accepted business rating systems, giving more weight to ratings that are produced by experts who are independent of the business under evaluation.

Further, the Impakter Index gives special weight to labels such as the US Environmental Protection Agency Water Sense or 1% For the Planet which was specifically created to fight greenwashing and provide accountability. The Impakter Index in fact is designed to be in line with internationally accepted standards, as developed by the UN SDGs and the OECD business guidelines.

Also, the Impakter Index is easy to comprehend, and this is the only way it is similar to the MSCI: It follows the well-tested model of credit rating agencies like Moore, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch, with all ratings translated into a clear scaling system based on 5 letters (A, B, C, D and F for fail).

For now, the Impakter index includes only the 100 top brands and 100 top employers as defined by Forbe’s list but in the near future, it will be expanded to more companies and the plan is to develop it into a global index. 

To understand better how the Impakter Index actually works, it is worth taking a look at the companies it has evaluated. 

Looking at some S&P 500 Companies that “supposedly” align with ESG criteria: Does the Impakter Index confirm it?

Take Google. It uses solar, wind, and other renewable energies. The company plans to decrease carbon emissions and to be carbon-free by 2030, aligning with United Nations’ goal. As a result, the Impakter Index rates the company with a “B” score, considering these efforts.

Or take Adobe Inc. It has one of the highest retention rates and provides great benefits for its employees. As mentioned in Great Place to Work “94% of employees at Adobe Systems Incorporated say it is a great place to work compared to 59% of employees at a typical U.S.-based company.” Accordingly, the Impakter Index evaluates Adobe as doing a great job too, considering they have also committed to using 100% renewable energy.

Another S&P 500 company, JP Morgan Chase, helps its local community through new business plans and generous donations. The company has invested $100 million in diverse-owned and -led financial institutions.

The company seems to be taking serious steps towards sustainability, however, JPMorgan Chase remains the largest financer of the fossil fuel industry and was branded by Forbes as the ‘dirtiest bank to fund fossil fuels. Since 2016, JPMorgan Chase has invested $316.735 B in fossil fuels. Because of all this, the Impakter Index has given the company a “D” score.

In the picture: People protest demanding better climate policies. Photo Credit: Unsplash.

How S&P 500 Companies DO NOT Align with ESG Criteria

There are many other companies that don’t align with ESG criteria.

Oil and gas company, Exxon Mobil, is one of the leading contributors to CO2 and CH4 emissions. About 3% of global emissions actually come from Exxon. The company has also been responsible for many oil spills in the past.

In recent years, Meta has violated user security through data breaches. These breaches leaked millions of users’ personal information, causing outrage. People felt confused and betrayed.

Some companies even have their employees working in poor conditions. For instance, Apple Inc. factory workers in India were forced to sleep in rat-infested dorms with no running water. Also, a strike broke out after a food poisoning outbreak led to many Apple worker hospitalizations.

Are S&P 500 Companies Aligned with ESG Criteria? Yes and No

Yes, some top listed companies from the S&P align to some degrees with ESG criteria. But not all of them. Overall, S&P 500 companies will vary in ESG rating. A company with a good rating in MSCI may have a bad rating in Impakter’s Index – and this should come as no surprise, given the difference in methodology between MSCI and the Impakter Index.

When making decisions about investing, having a look at different resources could make a big difference.


Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed here by Impakter.com columnists are their own, not those of Impakter.com.

Tags: AdobeESGExxon MobileGoogleJP Morgan ChaseMetaS&P 500Stock markets
Previous Post

Women in Conservation: How Jackie Bubi fights wildlife crime in East Africa

Next Post

Ukraine Crisis: The Threat of War and COVID

Kenya Benitez

Kenya Benitez

Kenya Benitez is a junior columnist at Impakter. She is currently studying Rhetoric and Writing Studies at San Diego State University. Her interests include sustainability, tech, and startups.

Related Posts

Exxon Doubles Down on ‘Advanced Recycling’ Claims That Yield few Results
Business

Exxon Doubles Down on ‘Advanced Recycling’ Claims That Yield few Results

May 22, 2022
Al Gore’s Generation Launches a $1.7 Billion Fund for Sustainable European Businesses
Business

Al Gore’s Generation Launches a $1.7 Billion Fund for Sustainable European Businesses

May 21, 2022
Tesla Removed From S&P 500 ESG Index, Musk: “ESG Is a Scam”
Business

Tesla Removed From S&P 500 ESG Index, Musk: “ESG Is a Scam”

May 20, 2022
Next Post
Ukraine Crisis: The Threat of War and COVID

Ukraine Crisis: The Threat of War and COVID

Recent News

Hundreds of Climate Activists Protest Against TotalEnergies’ New Fossil Fuel Projects

Hundreds of Climate Activists Protest Against TotalEnergies’ New Fossil Fuel Projects

May 26, 2022
Texas School Shooting Claims 21 Lives, Sparking Calls for Gun Reform

Texas School Shooting Claims 21 Lives, Sparking Calls for Gun Reform

May 26, 2022
Sustainable Malmö: Six Short Films Demonstrate How Cities Can Become More Sustainable

Sustainable Malmö: Six Short Films Demonstrate How Cities Can Become More Sustainable

May 26, 2022
impakter-logo-light

Impakter informs you through the eco news site and empowers your sustainable lifestyle with its eco products marketplace.

Visit here IMPAKTER ECO for your eco products needs.

Registered Office Address

32 Lots Road, London
SW10 0QJ, United Kingdom


IMPAKTER Limited

Company number: 10806931

Impakter is a publication that is identified by the following International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) is the following 2515-9569 (Printed) and 2515-9577 (online – Website).


Office Hours - Monday to Friday

9.30am - 5.00pm CEST


Email

stories [at] impakter.com

About Us

  • Team
  • Contributors
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Partners

By Audience

  • Lifestyle
  • Green Finance
  • Culture
  • Society
  • Style
  • Impact

Impakter Platforms

  • Media
  • Up
  • Index
  • Eco for Sellers
  • Impakter Pro

© 2022 IMPAKTER. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Culture
  • Style
  • Society
  • Impact
  • ECO Products Shop – Try now!
  • INDEX – Sustainability Index
  • UP – Startup Hub
  • About
    • Partners
    • Team
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
Impakter.com uses cookies to enhance your experience when visiting the website and to serve you with advertisements that might interest you. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.