Impakter
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Impakter logo
No Result
View All Result
UK public climate change

UK Government Is Ignoring Public Opinion on Climate Change

UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak continues to delay climate action despite public backing for green policy, new Greenpeace UK survey finds. He insists his decision to delay aims to reduce financial impact on “working families,” but many question his choices

Amy LewisbyAmy Lewis
October 2, 2023
in Climate Change, Politics & Foreign Affairs
0

When Sunak became Prime Minister in 2022, hopes were high that Truss’ “anti-nature” reign had ended. He promised in his first speech outside Number 10 that “protecting our environment” was a priority, and confirmed in the first round of Prime Minister’s Questions in Parliament that the UK government “will deliver on what [they] said at Cop [COP26].”

Yet, we are now seeing the prime minister take decisions that experts claim will either significantly delay or completely derail the agreed-to COP26 aim to reach global net zero by 2050. As one specialist says, “delay is tantamount to capitulation.”

Sunak continues to claim that the hold-up is for the financial good of the public. He said that his decision last week to delay the ban on selling new petrol or diesel cars would “save families thousands of pounds,” and that his approach to meeting the net zero target would be “more pragmatic [and] proportionate” than the original target allowed for.  

This did not go down well with the public. The policy director of Greenpeace UK, Douglas Parr, told AP News that Sunak is “taking the public for fools,” and that “rowing back on home insulation and commitments to help people move away from gas will ensure we stay at the mercy of volatile fossil fuels and exploitative energy companies.”

Tory MP Chris Skidmore agreed, stating that it is “the people who will pay the price for this will be householders, whose bills will remain higher as a result of inefficient fossil fuels and being dependent on volatile international fossil fuel prices.” 

In other words, Sunak’s claimed efforts to put public interest before government targets are likely to cause more long-term harm than good for both people and the planet.

The call for Sunak to stick to net zero targets is unignorable

Greenpeace UK decided to ask the public what they thought, and the results directly opposed Sunak’s for-the-people ethos. 

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Greenpeace UK (@greenpeaceuk)

Here are the main takeaways from the NGO’s recent poll:

  1. 70% of the public named climate policies as major factors influencing “how they [would] vote in the next election.”
  2. 85% of those in the Blue Wall (conservative constituencies in Southern England who opposed Brexit) wanted more government support with home insulation, and 73% wanted more subsidisation for heat pumps.
  3. 87% of residents of marginal seats were looking for “more government investment for renewable power,” and 79% wanted to see “subsidised rail travel” used as a viable alternative to driving.
  4. 80% of those in the Blue Wall “support the idea of a wealth tax on the richest 1% of people to fund action on climate change.”

So, not only does Sunak’s approach lack public backing, it may well cost him Blue Wall support. 

The list of environmental not-for-profit organisations speaking out against the UK government is ever-growing, with petitions, open letters and campaigns backed by the public emerging from NGOs across the country, including Greenpeace UK, Friends of the Earth and RenewableUK. 

We might now look back to January of this year, when the chief executive of nonprofit Generation Vegan (GenV), Naomi Hallum, wrote to Rishi Sunak with the offer of donating £1 million to his chosen charity, should he “go vegan for one month.” GenV had decided that “it was time to encourage the UK leader to follow his words with meaningful action.” Sunak’s response was revealing, GenV said:

“[…] Sunak’s representative sidestepped the issue. Instead of stating whether the Prime Minister would accept the offer to go vegan for one month, Spencer merely iterated that they were already taking all necessary steps ‘to ensure greater environmental sustainability’ and ‘towards achieving our 25-Year Environment Plan ambitions and our carbon net zero goals.’”

Sunak might have ignored calls from GenV, but now the call isn’t only coming from nonprofit organisations. 

Celebrities and businesses are also calling out Sunak for his lack of accountability. As Greenpeace reports, their open letter to all UK party leaders has been signed by “over 106,000” members of the UK public, as well as many big names including Emma Thompson, Mel B, Olivia Colman, Stephen Fry, Peter Capaldi, Benedict Cumberbatch, Paloma Faith, and Emilia Clarke, to name a few.


Related articles: How We Can Reach Net Zero, According to the IEA | Sunak’s First Week: What’s Happened to the UK’s Environmental Policy?

Motor company Ford UK is also “leading a furious business backlash” in opposition to Sunak’s decision to push the car sale ban to 2035; a sale labelled “immovable” by the UK government just two months ago. The company stated that delaying the ban compromises Sunak’s “ambition, commitment and consistency,” and managing director Lisa Brankin said that they’d already begun “investing to meet [the] challenge.” 

Where does this leave the UK?

Greenpeace UK’s survey aims to “[set] a standard for parties’ manifestos,” particularly as we approach the next election. Given the huge public, celebrity and business-led support for the inclusion of green policies in these manifestos, we might feel hopeful that Sunak could still change his mind on the “watering down [of] key green measures.” 

Greenpeace UK has recently launched Project Climate Vote, an initiative that sees volunteers trained to “recruit a million climate voters” by knocking on the nation’s doors. This project could force UK political leaders to take note of the public’s growing focus on climate issues. Greenpeace UK’s campaigner, Georgia Whitaker, said: 

“The next general election is a key moment to ensure the next government listens to voters’ concerns on the climate. This is why we’re rolling out a nationwide mass door-knocking programme to recruit at least one million Climate Voters. For too long politicians have served the interests of the elite, making fossil fuel giants and water companies ever richer at the expense of ordinary people and the planet. This polling proves that a majority of people in this country want more climate action, not less, so we’re not going to allow self-serving politicians to split the public and turn these vital issues into a political football. A climate majority already exists, and in the next election they will be a political force that all parties will have to reckon with.”

Sunak’s time as Prime Minister has shown him continually pushing climate issues to the bottom of the pile. Yet, Greenpeace UK has provided proof that this is not what the public wants.

The NGO’s new manifesto calls for the prioritisation of energy-efficient heating solutions to help with the UK’s cost of living crisis, a greater investment into environmentally friendly industries and the creation of more jobs in these industries, and the maintaining of cheap public transport that is available for all. 

Unlike Sunak’s delays, these aims should help the British public both in the short and long term.


Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed here by the authors are their own, not those of Impakter.com — In the Featured Photo: Sunak (not) going vegan, London, January 11, 2023. Featured Photo Credit: Samuel Regan-Asante.

Tags: Climate ActionClimate Changeclimate policyCOP26GreenpeaceNet ZeroProject Climate Votepublic opinionRishi SunakukUnited Kingdom
Previous Post

Why Are Glaciers Important?

Next Post

Charting the Green Course: Amazon vs. Alibaba on the Road to Sustainability

Related Posts

ESG News covering Great British Energy’s 2030 clean-power strategy, UK government investment, nationwide renewable expansion, community energy projects, offshore wind development, and job creation in the energy transition.
Business

Great British Energy Unveils 2030 Clean Power Strategy

Today’s ESG Updates Great British Energy 2030 Clean Power Plan: GBE outlines a five-year strategy to deliver 15 GW of...

byJana Deghidy
December 4, 2025
ESG News regarding Flooding in Indonesia; Glencore promises copper production boost; Trump proposes slashing fuel efficiency standards, and Vulcan Energy receives $2.57bn of funding for lithium project
Business

Indonesians Blame Deforestation for Recent Floodings

Today’s ESG Updates: More than 700 Lives Lost in Recent Indonesian Floods: A combination of mass deforestation and heavy rainfall...

byAriq Haidar
December 4, 2025
How a Framework Convention Could Address Climate and Socio-Economic Displacement
Politics & Foreign Affairs

How a Framework Convention Could Address Climate and Socio-Economic Displacement

The unprecedented shift in human (im)mobility has seen over 120 million forced to flee their homes due to war, violence,...

byDr. Shepherd Mutsvara - Research Fellow at the University of Münster, Germany
December 3, 2025
ESG News regarding the UK’s Updated Environmental Improvement Plan, modernizing Mauritania’s railway system, the EU carbon border tax, and the EU’s cross-border energy projects
Business

UK Unveils Updated Environmental Improvement Plan

Today’s ESG Updates UK Accelerates Nature Recovery: The government commits £500m to Landscape Recovery and targets 250,000 hectares of restored...

bySarah Perras
December 1, 2025
fossil fuel subsidies
Business

How G20 Nations Can Make Progress After the Group Stalls on Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform

The 2025 G20 Leaders’ Summit in South Africa sent mixed signals on climate action. In this year’s Leaders’ Declaration, climate change...

byInternational Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
November 28, 2025
EU Parliament Supports One-Year Delay to Deforestation Regulation
ESG News

EU Parliament Supports One-Year Delay to Deforestation Regulation

Today’s ESG Updates EU Parliament Backs Delay to Deforestation Law: Lawmakers support a one-year extension for EUDR compliance.  UK Opens...

byLena McDonough
November 27, 2025
Animal Health
Biodiversity

Better Animal Health Is the Low-Risk, High-Reward Climate Investment We Need

Imagine if there was a way to reduce emissions from the meat, egg and dairy sector by nearly a quarter,...

byCarel du Marchie Sarvaas
November 26, 2025
ESG News regarding Warming in High Mountains. Young trees planted on restored farmland, symbolizing investment in natural climate solutions and biodiversity monitoring. Simple chart concept showing most institutional investors planning higher allocations to sustainable funds.
Environment

Mountains Are Warming Faster, Putting Billions at Risk

Today’s ESG Updates Mountains Warm Faster: New study warns rising flood risk and water stress for 1+ billion people. Nature...

byAda Omar
November 26, 2025
Next Post
Charting the Green Course: Amazon vs. Alibaba on the Road to Sustainability

Charting the Green Course: Amazon vs. Alibaba on the Road to Sustainability

Recent News

ESG News covering Great British Energy’s 2030 clean-power strategy, UK government investment, nationwide renewable expansion, community energy projects, offshore wind development, and job creation in the energy transition.

Great British Energy Unveils 2030 Clean Power Strategy

December 4, 2025
Crypto Portfolio Margin Access defined

What Is Crypto Portfolio Margin Access?

December 4, 2025
Governments Are Hiding Data, Threatening Democracy. Here’s How It Affects You

Governments Are Hiding Data, Threatening Democracy. Here’s How It Affects You

December 4, 2025
  • ESG News
  • Sustainable Finance
  • Business

© 2025 Impakter.com owned by Klimado GmbH

No Result
View All Result
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

© 2025 Impakter.com owned by Klimado GmbH