Impakter
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Impakter logo
No Result
View All Result
How Much Do Fossil Fuel Giants Owe in Climate Damages? $5,444 Billion, New Study Says

How Much Do Fossil Fuel Giants Owe in Climate Damages? $5,444 Billion, New Study Says

New analysis published in One Earth quantifies that a total of $5,444bn is owed by the top 21 fossil fuel companies in reparation funds, proposing how much each firm should repay over the period of 2025-2050

Jessica MasonbyJessica Mason
May 24, 2023
in Climate Change, Environment
0

On May 19, One Earth published a study titled “Time to Pay the Piper: Fossil fuel companies’ reparations for climate damages,” which demands that fossil fuel firms pay sufficient reparations for the damage they have caused. The authors behind the analysis state that: “Fossil fuel companies have a moral responsibility to affected parties for climate harm and have a duty to rectify such harm.” 

The study drew attention to the fact that the countries that are suffering the greatest impacts of climate damage are the ones who have contributed the least to it. The impact of the degradation of the planet falls “disproportionally” on the Global South, as the authors behind the One Earth study emphasise, and these populations in Africa, Asia and Latin America contribute only 8% of excess emissions. 

The authors of the study stress that those who have caused the greatest climate disruption are greatly profiting, whilst other countries are forced to suffer. 

An article by the Guardian, commenting on this issue, touched on the example of the Caribbean. It explained that Jamaica has suffered spells of extreme heat and droughts that have lasted for months due to climate change, detrimentally impacting their water supply and their agricultural market. In addition, André Wright, the author of the article, spoke with the prime minister of Belize, Johnny Briceño, who said that major fossil fuel producers “have a moral and legal responsibility to the rest of countries suffering from climate change.”

These are the consequences of the actions of the richest fossil fuel companies. A 2020 study by OXFAM and Stockholm Environment Institute revealed that, between 1990 and 2015, the world’s richest 1% of the population was responsible for 15% of harmful emissions. 


Related Articles: Cutting Emissions: Can The Rich Pay the Poor To Do it On Their Behalf? | Are Major Corporations Doing Enough To Tackle Their Carbon Footprint? | Fossil Fuel Consumption Subsidies Hit All-Time High in 2022: Will We Ever Abolish Them? | Groundbreaking Lawsuit: Shell’s Board of Directors Sued for Climate Inaction

The basis of the One Earth study is to quantify the damage that large fossil fuel firms have caused to the planet. The report includes a table which illustrates the reparations owed by the top 21 fossil fuel companies over the period of 2025–2050. According to the analysis and the proposed reparations, the largest 21 companies analysed would need to disburse $5,444 billion over this period.

The companies which have done the most damage would have to pay the most, as highlighted below.

In the Table: Column A reports the atmospheric contributions of the top twenty-one carbon fuel producers, 1988 to 2022; Column B reports each company’s percent of global fossil fuel emissions; Column C reports cumulative reparations; and Column D reports the average annual reparations over the period 2025-2050. Source: Time to pay the piper: Fossil fuel companies’ reparations for climate damages / One Earth

Furthermore, the study also included a pie chart to illustrate the annual reparations each company should pay from 2025–2050, in billion US$.

In the Figure: Fossil fuel companies’ average annual reparations, 2025–2050 (billion US$, current). Source: Time to pay the piper: Fossil fuel companies’ reparations for climate damages / One Earth

The One Earth study reflects a belief that by holding the biggest fossil fuel emitters accountable for the damage they have caused, change can become more tangible. The payment of reparations could help to promote a global movement towards more sustainable business practices, because it will mark a transition away from the business models that produce “profit-maximising bystanders of climate disruption.” 

The study suggests that a focus on the fossil fuel industry when considering climate damage and reparations “will help bridge the divide between ‘the rich’ and ‘the poor’ worlds.” This divide, according to the study, “still hampers climate progress.” The authors also explain that the burden of battling climate change would be more fairly distributed.

According to the study, the reparation money would “mitigate emissions, fund adaptation, and compensate subjects more vulnerable to climate harm such as climate migrants and refugees, Indigenous peoples, racial and ethnic minority communities, people with disabilities, and people who are socially and economically disadvantaged.” 

These reparations must be paid in order to establish a world that is more equal and fair. 

Responding to the paper, Kristin Casper, General Counsel at Greenpeace International, asserted that:

“The analysis offers a starting point for much needed action to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for their financial responsibilities. Now, communities on the frontline of environmental breakdown can decide how to wield the study’s powerful findings in their own struggles for justice.”

The authors behind the One Earth study intended it to be “a starting point for open discussion of shared responsibility for climate harm.” 

The fossil fuel industry has a duty to improve the conditions they have caused. Climate victims are owed reparations. This is just the beginning of a global demand that the biggest emitters pay up.


Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed here by the authors are their own, not those of Impakter.com — In the Featured Photo: Smoke coming out of towers. Featured Photo Credit: Ella Ivanescu.

Tags: Climate Actionclimate damagesemission reductionemissionsfossil fuel industryreparations
Previous Post

Can an Economy Grow While Carbon Emissions Decrease? Europe Shows How

Next Post

No More Burning Clothes: Destruction of Unsold Textiles To Be Banned in Europe

Related Posts

ESG News regarding Warming in High Mountains. Young trees planted on restored farmland, symbolizing investment in natural climate solutions and biodiversity monitoring. Simple chart concept showing most institutional investors planning higher allocations to sustainable funds.
Environment

Mountains Are Warming Faster, Putting Billions at Risk

Today’s ESG Updates Mountains Warm Faster: New study warns rising flood risk and water stress for 1+ billion people. Nature...

byAda Omar
November 26, 2025
Encouraging Evidence of Momentum in Negotiations at COP30
Biodiversity

Encouraging Evidence of Momentum in Negotiations at COP30

With the second week of negotiations now underway at COP30, WWF is encouraged by an announcement by the Brazilian Presidency...

byWWF
November 18, 2025
ESG news regarding WBCSD and One Planet Network launch the Global Circularity Protocol for business at COP30 in Belém, Apple adds Lancaster, Victoria solar and funds 8,600 ha NZ forest restoration to match device charging with clean power by 2030, China’s emissions flat or falling for 18 months as solar and wind surge and power demand rises, Nike signs multi-year deals with Syre and Loop to source textile-to-textile recycled polyester, anchoring Loop’s India facility targeting 81% lower emissions
Business

WBCSD and One Planet Network Launch Global Circularity Protocol at COP30

Today’s ESG Updates COP30 Launch: First global circularity protocol for business aims to save 120bn tonnes of materials and avoid...

byAda Omar
November 12, 2025
world cup 2026 pollution
Environment

World Cup 2026 to Be the ‘Most Polluting Ever’: What Can FIFA Do?

The FIFA World Cup 2026 is poised to be the largest of its kind, expanding from 32 teams to 48,...

byMaaz Ismail
September 24, 2025
ESG news regarding Microsoft and OpenAI deal, Germany and EU engine ban, Canada and oil emissions limit, India’s coal sector
Business

OpenAI Can Restructure Itself Following Non-Binding Deal with Microsoft

Today’s ESG Updates Microsoft, OpenAI Agree on For-Profit Restructure: A new non-binding deal lets OpenAI restructure as a for-profit company....

byYuxi Lim
September 12, 2025
Scientific Data and Computing Center
AI & MACHINE LEARNING

What Is the Environmental Cost of Generative AI?

The concept of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been around since the 1950s, but the technology has evolved at an accelerated...

byMaaz Ismail
July 28, 2025
ai climate
AI & MACHINE LEARNING

Maximizing Emerging Trends in Locally Led AI Solutions for Climate Action

In May 2025, the Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) hosted a webinar showcasing locally led artificial intelligence (AI) and...

byInternational Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
July 24, 2025
Torres Strait Islands
Climate Change

Australian Court Rules Against Indigenous Islanders in Publicized Climate Case

Australians indigenous to a collection of islands off the country’s northern coast lost a landmark climate litigation case against the...

byAlessandro Camillo
July 18, 2025
Next Post
No More Burning Clothes: Destruction of Unsold Textiles To Be Banned in Europe

No More Burning Clothes: Destruction of Unsold Textiles To Be Banned in Europe

Recent News

The Best Virtual Office Address In London For Your Startup

How To Choose The Best Virtual Office Address In London For Your Startup

December 5, 2025
Granddaddy Purple Strain

Where Granddaddy Purple Strain Gets Its Iconic Grape Flavor

December 5, 2025
ESG news regarding Deforestation Mandate Being Pushed; EUs Acceleration on Hydrogen and Net Zero Revolution; AT&T Will End All DEI; UK Watchdog Blocks Nike and Lacoste Ads Over Green Claims.

U-Turn in Europe: Deforestation Mandate Pushed Back Again

December 5, 2025
  • ESG News
  • Sustainable Finance
  • Business

© 2025 Impakter.com owned by Klimado GmbH

No Result
View All Result
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Global Leaders
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

© 2025 Impakter.com owned by Klimado GmbH