Impakter
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Impakter logo
No Result
View All Result
Colorado Votes to Repeal Death Penalty

Colorado Votes to Repeal Death Penalty

Meghan DawsonbyMeghan Dawson
March 13, 2020
in Editors' Picks
0

On Feb. 26, 2020, Colorado lawmakers voted to pass a bill which will repeal Colorado’s death penalty. The bill is now awaiting a signature from the Governor of Colorado, Jared Polis. Consequently, Colorado will be the 22nd state to repeal the death penalty.

Starting July 1, 2020, the severest possible sentence for capital crimes will be life in prison. These crimes include child abuse, premeditated murder, and first-degree kidnapping. Prior to the repeal, Colorado’s only permitted method of execution has been the lethal injection since 1988.

In order to transform a bill into a law, Colorado state law requires thirty-three favorable votes from the House of Representatives, eighteen votes from the Senate, and the signature of approval from the Governor.

Over half of Colorado House of Representatives are democrats who were generally opposed to the death penalty and were eager to pass the bill. The controversy arose from Senate, whose members were split on the subject. Now that the bill has passed both branches of Congress, Democrat and first-ever openly gay United States Governor Jared Polis is expected to swiftly sign the bill.

Governor Polis has long-established his stance against capital punishment, arguing that it is inhumane, cost-ineffective, and discriminatory policy.

In 2018, the Governor asserted, “I will sign it [the Colorado bill abolishing death penalty]. It’s not cost effective. It’s not an effective deterrent. And, you know, I do have a problem with some of the ways it’s been implemented from a racial-bias perspective as well. I mean, the fact that all three people on death row happen to be African American and yet the theater killer who killed 14 people didn’t get it, but somebody who killed two people got it, I mean, it makes you just sort of ask that question about why somebody who killed two people got it and why somebody who killed 14 people didn’t.”

Currently, there are three death row inmates in Colorado. While repealing the death penalty would not normally affect their sentences, Governor Polis has confirmed that he may grant the inmates clemency following the repeal.

Elaborating on the implications of the new bill, Polis said, “I would certainly take that as a strong indication that those who are currently on death row should have their sentences commuted to life in prison.”


Related Articles: Pot Luck: The Altered State of Colorado | Doctors Among Victims of Opioid Epidemic

Among the Senators against the repeal was Assistant Majority Leader Rhonda Fields, whose son and fiancée were murdered in 2005 by two of the three inmates currently on Colorado’s death row.

Senator Fields grapples with the repeal, stating, “It’s hurtful, because it reminds me of my own personal trauma and scars as it relates to the death of my son and his fiancée, and I have to live with that pain and those scars every day.”

Today, we debate the repeal of the death penalty in Colorado.

While the issue – and this vote – will divide both caucuses, we ALL admire @SenRhondaFields today.

Her voice, her story, and her courage are an inspiration for us all. Much love and admiration, Senator. #COpolitics pic.twitter.com/gmktut3Bhh

— Colorado Senate Republicans (@ColoSenGOP) January 30, 2020

This is not the first time Colorado has attempted to abolish the death penalty: this 2020 repeal will be the fourth time the penalty has been overturned in Colorado history. Capital punishment was first abolished in 1897, and then the practice was reinstated in 1901.

Eventually, death penalty was halted again as a result of the 1972 case Furman v. Georgia, which established the death penalty as unconstitutional. In order to reinstate capital punishment once more, Colorado lawmakers passed a rewritten death penalty law in 1974 which was consequently revoked in 1978, and then once again reinstated finally in 1979.

The death penalty fails to do those things while also risking innocent lives. My experience shows it is an ineffective and expensive system, and my philosophical stance is that the state should not have the power of life and death.

— Republican Senator Jack Tate

One of the senators who changed his vote to help pass the repeal was Republican Jack Tate. Senator Tate explained his change of heart, “I believe we should promote public policies that make our communities safer and provide victims with the services they need. The death penalty fails to do those things while also risking innocent lives. My experience shows it is an ineffective and expensive system, and my philosophical stance is that the state should not have the power of life and death.”


Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed here by Impakter.com columnists are their own, not those of Impakter.com. — In the photo: American flag behind barbed wire — Photo credit: Babawawa
Tags: Capital punishmentColoradocrimedeath penaltyhouse of representativesjared polisLawlethal injectionrhonda fieldsSenate
Previous Post

Why Cities, Towns and Regions Are Creating a Roadmap Towards 100% Renewable Energy

Next Post

Buildings and Construction: A sleeping giant for climate action

Related Posts

Cybersecurity Standards
Business

Preparing Law Firms for Evolving Cybersecurity Standards

Law firms are under intensifying pressure from regulators to demonstrate stronger, more resilient protection of sensitive information. Even solo practitioners...

byHannah Fischer-Lauder
December 31, 2025
Can Government Efforts to Regulate AI in the Workplace Make a Difference?
AI & MACHINE LEARNING

Can Government Efforts to Regulate AI in the Workplace Make a Difference?

An overview of AI regulations and laws around the world designed to ensure that the technology benefits individuals and society,...

byRichard Seifman - Former World Bank Senior Health Advisor and U.S. Senior Foreign Service Officer
December 18, 2025
Immigration Lawyers
Society

Why Immigration Lawyers Help With Difficult Visa Cases

In most countries, the process of obtaining a visa is not that easy. Not to mention the variety of strict...

byHannah Fischer-Lauder
November 27, 2025
Trump racism
Society

Moral Life in an Age of Bullies: America’s Mayors Offer Alternatives to Trump’s Racist Defamations

“Living a moral life in an age of bullies requires collective action; it cannot be done alone. Each of us...

byDr. Annis Pratt
August 12, 2025
Under the current crypto market landscape, questions are raised on the ethical correctness of crypto
Business

Is Crypto Corrupt?

Kidnapping…ransom…political power…  Somehow, these words do not seem so alien within the crypto world, and if anything, they are growing...

byPeter Vigh
May 15, 2025
Trump lawyers
Politics & Foreign Affairs

How Trump’s Executive Actions Undermine the American Legal System

The first few weeks of the Trump Administration have resulted in significant legal actions and policies that are sharply at...

byRichard Seifman - Former World Bank Senior Health Advisor and U.S. Senior Foreign Service Officer
March 27, 2025
abortion crime
Society

Crime Rate and Availability of Abortion: Are the Two Related?

The relationship between abortion legislation and crime rates is a complex and often controversial topic, intertwining elements of social science,...

byRichard Seifman - Former World Bank Senior Health Advisor and U.S. Senior Foreign Service Officer
September 6, 2024
Rights of Rivers
Environment

Rights of Rivers Victory in the UK: The Journey, Challenges, and Implications

Pioneered by the Environmental Law Foundation, the Rights of Rivers in Lewes, UK, sets a landmark precedent, weaving nature's rights...

byLasserina Rath
December 12, 2023
Next Post
Buildings and Construction: A sleeping giant for climate action

Buildings and Construction: A sleeping giant for climate action

Recent News

Deep Sea Mining

The Quiet Financial Backers Behind Deep-Sea Mining

February 24, 2026
Protests arise against Wall street’s oil deals, Big tech accounts for half of global clean energy, EU proposes stricter standards for corporate vehicles, DHL introduces new portfolio offerings for reducing scope 3 impacts

Activists Protest Against Wall Street’s Oil Deals

February 24, 2026
New U.S. Tariffs and One Health: The Likely Consequences

New U.S. Tariffs and One Health: The Likely Consequences

February 23, 2026
  • ESG News
  • Sustainable Finance
  • Business

© 2025 Impakter.com owned by Klimado GmbH

No Result
View All Result
  • Environment
    • Biodiversity
    • Climate Change
    • Circular Economy
    • Energy
  • FINANCE
    • ESG News
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Business
  • TECH
    • Start-up
    • AI & Machine Learning
    • Green Tech
  • Industry News
    • Entertainment
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Health
    • Politics & Foreign Affairs
    • Philanthropy
    • Science
    • Sport
  • Editorial Series
    • SDGs Series
    • Shape Your Future
    • Sustainable Cities
      • Copenhagen
      • San Francisco
      • Seattle
      • Sydney
  • About us
    • Company
    • Team
    • Partners
    • Write for Impakter
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

© 2025 Impakter.com owned by Klimado GmbH